Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 21 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 149 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 410 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 685 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Wise, Steven L. | 10 |
| Sinharay, Sandip | 7 |
| Sawaki, Yasuyo | 6 |
| Attali, Yigal | 5 |
| Bennett, Randy Elliot | 5 |
| Bridgeman, Brent | 5 |
| Lee, Yong-Won | 5 |
| Ling, Guangming | 5 |
| Luecht, Richard M. | 5 |
| Nese, Joseph F. T. | 5 |
| Liu, Ou Lydia | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 6 |
| Teachers | 6 |
| Researchers | 4 |
| Parents | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
| China | 20 |
| Florida | 20 |
| Turkey | 20 |
| Iran | 18 |
| Taiwan | 16 |
| Japan | 13 |
| Germany | 12 |
| Canada | 11 |
| Texas | 11 |
| Australia | 10 |
| United Kingdom | 10 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 7 |
| Race to the Top | 2 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Head Start | 1 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
DeAyala, R. J.; Koch, William R. – 1986
A computerized flexilevel test was implemented and its ability estimates were compared with those of a Bayesian estimation based computerized adaptive test (CAT) as well as with known true ability estimates. Results showed that when the flexilevel test was terminated according to Lord's criterion, its ability estimates were highly and…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis
Sorensen, H. Barbara – AEDS Monitor, 1985
This study validated computerized versions of selected tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests of 1976, compared performance of higher education students on computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the tests, and explored whether gender, academic status, or age interacted with the tests. (MBR)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, Comparative Analysis
Mangunkusumo, Resiti T.; Duisterhout, Joop S.; de Graaff, Nijs; Maarsingh, Erik J.; de Koning, Harry J.; Raat, Hein – Journal of School Health, 2006
The Internet has become an inevitable tool for collecting health and health behavior questionnaires. This study compared the feasibility, presence of score differences, and subjective evaluations by children between Internet and identical paper (asthma/fruit) questionnaires in elementary schools. A randomized crossover design was applied, with…
Descriptors: Grade 5, Questionnaires, Internet, Diseases
Kobrin, Jennifer L.; Deng, Hui; Shaw, Emily J. – Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 2007
This study was designed to address two frequent criticisms of the SAT essay--that essay length is the best predictor of scores, and that there is an advantage in using more "sophisticated" examples as opposed to personal experience. The study was based on 2,820 essays from the first three administrations of the new SAT. Each essay was…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Computer Assisted Testing, Construct Validity, Writing Skills
Sebrechts, Marc M.; And Others – 1991
This study evaluated agreement between expert system and human scores on 12 algebra word problems taken by Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) General Test examinees from a general sample of 285 and a study sample of 30. Problems were drawn from three content classes (rate x time, work, and interest) and presented in four constructed-response…
Descriptors: Algebra, Automation, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing
PDF pending restorationSmith, Nancy J.; And Others – 1993
Results of administering a computerized adaptive version of the Grammar, Spelling, and Punctuation Test (GSP) to students in the College of Communication at the University of Texas, Austin were studied. The computerized adaptive version (CAT) was administered for the first time in June 1992 to 35 prospective students who participated in the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Yu, Lei; Livingston, Samuel A.; Larkin, Kevin C.; Bonett, John – ETS Research Report Series, 2004
This study compared essay scores from paper-based and computer-based versions of a writing test for prospective teachers. Scores for essays in the paper-based version averaged nearly half a standard deviation higher than those in the computer-based version, after applying a statistical control for demographic differences between the groups of…
Descriptors: Essays, Writing (Composition), Computer Assisted Testing, Technology Uses in Education
Weiss, David J.; McBride, James R. – 1983
Monte Carlo simulation was used to investigate score bias and information characteristics of Owen's Bayesian adaptive testing strategy, and to examine possible causes of score bias. Factors investigated in three related studies included effects of item discrimination, effects of fixed vs. variable test length, and effects of an accurate prior…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Computer Assisted Testing
Truell, Allen D.; Zhao, Jensen J.; Alexander, Melody W. – Journal of Career and Technical Education, 2005
The purposes of this study were to determine if there is a significant difference in postsecondary business student scores and test completion time based on settable test item exposure control interface format, and to determine if there is a significant difference in student scores and test completion time based on settable test item exposure…
Descriptors: College Students, Scores, Tests, Gender Differences
Montague, Dave – MultiMedia Schools, 2000
Describes the use of the Northwest Evaluation Association's Achievement Level Test for Reading as an assessment tool in an elementary school to measure student progress in reading. Discusses interpreting scores across grade levels; computerized versions; linking test items to new curriculum; reducing reading class size; and the role of technology.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Class Size, Computer Assisted Testing
Siskind, Theresa G.; And Others – 1992
The instructional validity of computer administered tests was studied with a focus on whether differences in test scores and item behavior are a function of instructional mode (computer versus non-computer). In the first of 3 studies, performance test scores for approximately 400 high school students in 1990-91 for tasks accomplished with the…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Comprehension, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing
Puhan, Gautam; Boughton, Keith A.; Kim, Sooyeon – ETS Research Report Series, 2005
The study evaluated the comparability of two versions of a teacher certification test: a paper-and-pencil test (PPT) and computer-based test (CBT). Standardized mean difference (SMD) and differential item functioning (DIF) analyses were used as measures of comparability at the test and item levels, respectively. Results indicated that effect sizes…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Test Items, Statistical Analysis, Teacher Certification
Olsen, James B.; And Others – 1986
Student achievement test scores were compared and equated, using three different testing methods: paper-administered, computer-administered, and computerized adaptive testing. The tests were developed from third and sixth grade mathematics item banks of the California Assessment Program. The paper and the computer-administered tests were identical…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Gosser, Jon; And Others – 1979
A study involving four sections of a general psychology course at Delta College (Michigan) was conducted to determine: (1) the effectiveness of repeated, cumulative testing on long-term retention of information; (2) its effect on students' ability to generalize information learned as measured by the College Level Examination Program (CLEP) general…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Computer Assisted Testing, Course Objectives, Educational Testing
Rizavi, Saba; Way, Walter D.; Davey, Tim; Herbert, Erin – Educational Testing Service, 2004
Item parameter estimates vary for a variety of reasons, including estimation error, characteristics of the examinee samples, and context effects (e.g., item location effects, section location effects, etc.). Although we expect variation based on theory, there is reason to believe that observed variation in item parameter estimates exceeds what…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Computation, Context Effect

Peer reviewed
Direct link
