Publication Date
In 2025 | 5 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
Scoring | 5 |
Artificial Intelligence | 3 |
Computer Software | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Correlation | 2 |
Creative Thinking | 2 |
Creativity Tests | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Learning Analytics | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
British Educational Research… | 1 |
International Electronic… | 1 |
Journal of Creative Behavior | 1 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Journal of Learning Analytics | 1 |
Author
Alex J. Mechaber | 1 |
Arnon Hershkovitz | 1 |
Bhashithe Abeysinghe | 1 |
Brian E. Clauser | 1 |
Congning Ni | 1 |
Denis Dumas | 1 |
Eran Hadas | 1 |
Jonas Flodén | 1 |
Juanita Hicks | 1 |
Kai North | 1 |
Le An Ha | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Education Level
Junior High Schools | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Grade 9 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
Torrance Tests of Creative… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Selcuk Acar; Peter Organisciak; Denis Dumas – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
In this three-study investigation, we applied various approaches to score drawings created in response to both Form A and Form B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Figural (broadly TTCT-F) as well as the Multi-Trial Creative Ideation task (MTCI). We focused on TTCT-F in Study 1, and utilizing a random forest classifier, we achieved 79% and…
Descriptors: Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Models, Correlation
Peter Baldwin; Victoria Yaneva; Kai North; Le An Ha; Yiyun Zhou; Alex J. Mechaber; Brian E. Clauser – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Recent developments in the use of large-language models have led to substantial improvements in the accuracy of content-based automated scoring of free-text responses. The reported accuracy levels suggest that automated systems could have widespread applicability in assessment. However, before they are used in operational testing, other aspects of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Scoring, Computational Linguistics, Accuracy
Jonas Flodén – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
This study compares how the generative AI (GenAI) large language model (LLM) ChatGPT performs in grading university exams compared to human teachers. Aspects investigated include consistency, large discrepancies and length of answer. Implications for higher education, including the role of teachers and ethics, are also discussed. Three…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Artificial Intelligence, Comparative Testing, Scoring
Eran Hadas; Arnon Hershkovitz – Journal of Learning Analytics, 2025
Creativity is an imperative skill for today's learners, one that has important contributions to issues of inclusion and equity in education. Therefore, assessing creativity is of major importance in educational contexts. However, scoring creativity based on traditional tools suffers from subjectivity and is heavily time- and labour-consuming. This…
Descriptors: Creativity, Evaluation Methods, Computer Assisted Testing, Artificial Intelligence
Congning Ni; Bhashithe Abeysinghe; Juanita Hicks – International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2025
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), often referred to as The Nation's Report Card, offers a window into the state of U.S. K-12 education system. Since 2017, NAEP has transitioned to digital assessments, opening new research opportunities that were previously impossible. Process data tracks students' interactions with the…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Multiple Choice Tests, Behavior Change, National Competency Tests