Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
Curriculum Based Assessment | 2 |
Grade 2 | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Oral Reading | 2 |
Reading Fluency | 2 |
Reading Tests | 2 |
Scoring | 2 |
Automation | 1 |
Differences | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 2 | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Intermediate Grades | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Oregon | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
easyCBM | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Kahn, Josh; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2017
Despite prevalent use and practical application, the current and standard assessment of oral reading fluency (ORF) presents considerable limitations which reduces its validity in estimating growth and monitoring student progress, including: (a) high cost of implementation; (b) tenuous passage equivalence; and (c) bias, large standard error, and…
Descriptors: Automation, Speech, Recognition (Psychology), Scores
Kahn, Josh; Nese, Joseph T.; Alonzo, Julie – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2016
There is strong theoretical support for oral reading fluency (ORF) as an essential building block of reading proficiency. The current and standard ORF assessment procedure requires that students read aloud a grade-level passage (˜ 250 words) in a one-to-one administration, with the number of words read correctly in 60 seconds constituting their…
Descriptors: Teacher Surveys, Oral Reading, Reading Tests, Computer Assisted Testing