Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 9 |
Scoring | 9 |
Essay Tests | 7 |
Essays | 7 |
Writing Evaluation | 7 |
Validity | 5 |
Measurement | 4 |
Writing Instruction | 4 |
Computer Software Evaluation | 3 |
Psychometrics | 3 |
Student Placement | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessing Writing | 9 |
Author
James, Cindy L. | 2 |
Ramineni, Chaitanya | 2 |
Condon, William | 1 |
Deane, Paul | 1 |
Deess, Perry | 1 |
Elliot, Norbert | 1 |
Joshi, Kamal | 1 |
Klobucar, Andrew | 1 |
McCurry, Doug | 1 |
Rudniy, Oleksandr | 1 |
Weigle, Sara Cushing | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Evaluative | 7 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 5 |
Postsecondary Education | 5 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ramineni, Chaitanya; Williamson, David M. – Assessing Writing, 2013
In this paper, we provide an overview of psychometric procedures and guidelines Educational Testing Service (ETS) uses to evaluate automated essay scoring for operational use. We briefly describe the e-rater system, the procedures and criteria used to evaluate e-rater, implications for a range of potential uses of e-rater, and directions for…
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Guidelines, Scoring, Psychometrics
Deane, Paul – Assessing Writing, 2013
This paper examines the construct measured by automated essay scoring (AES) systems. AES systems measure features of the text structure, linguistic structure, and conventional print form of essays; as such, the systems primarily measure text production skills. In the current state-of-the-art, AES provide little direct evidence about such matters…
Descriptors: Scoring, Essays, Text Structure, Writing (Composition)
Ramineni, Chaitanya – Assessing Writing, 2013
In this paper, I describe the design and evaluation of automated essay scoring (AES) models for an institution's writing placement program. Information was gathered on admitted student writing performance at a science and technology research university in the northeastern United States. Under timed conditions, first-year students (N = 879) were…
Descriptors: Validity, Comparative Analysis, Internet, Student Placement
Klobucar, Andrew; Elliot, Norbert; Deess, Perry; Rudniy, Oleksandr; Joshi, Kamal – Assessing Writing, 2013
This study investigated the use of automated essay scoring (AES) to identify at-risk students enrolled in a first-year university writing course. An application of AES, the "Criterion"[R] Online Writing Evaluation Service was evaluated through a methodology focusing on construct modelling, response processes, disaggregation, extrapolation,…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Scoring, Writing Instruction, Essays
Condon, William – Assessing Writing, 2013
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) has garnered a great deal of attention from the rhetoric and composition/writing studies community since the Educational Testing Service began using e-rater[R] and the "Criterion"[R] Online Writing Evaluation Service as products in scoring writing tests, and most of the responses have been negative. While the…
Descriptors: Measurement, Psychometrics, Evaluation Methods, Educational Testing
Weigle, Sara Cushing – Assessing Writing, 2013
This article presents considerations for using automated scoring systems to evaluate second language writing. A distinction is made between English language learners in English-medium educational systems and those studying English in their own countries for a variety of purposes, and between learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in a second…
Descriptors: Scoring, Second Language Learning, Second Languages, English Language Learners
McCurry, Doug – Assessing Writing, 2010
This article considers the claim that machine scoring of writing test responses agrees with human readers as much as humans agree with other humans. These claims about the reliability of machine scoring of writing are usually based on specific and constrained writing tasks, and there is reason for asking whether machine scoring of writing requires…
Descriptors: Writing Tests, Scoring, Interrater Reliability, Computer Assisted Testing
James, Cindy L. – Assessing Writing, 2008
The scoring of student essays by computer has generated much debate and subsequent research. The majority of the research thus far has focused on validating the automated scoring tools by comparing the electronic scores to human scores of writing or other measures of writing skills, and exploring the predictive validity of the automated scores.…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, Scoring, Electronic Equipment, Essays
James, Cindy L. – Assessing Writing, 2006
How do scores from writing samples generated by computerized essay scorers compare to those generated by ''untrained'' human scorers and what combination of scores, if any, is more accurate at placing students in composition courses? This study endeavored to answer this two-part question by evaluating the correspondence between writing sample…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Predictive Validity, Scoring, Validity