Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Behavior Patterns | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment | 2 |
Author
| Ellens, Brent M. | 1 |
| Glas, Cees A. W. | 1 |
| Makransky, Guido | 1 |
| McMinn, Mark R. | 1 |
| Mortensen, Erik Lykke | 1 |
| Soref, Erez | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Denmark | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| NEO Personality Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMakransky, Guido; Mortensen, Erik Lykke; Glas, Cees A. W. – Assessment, 2013
Narrowly defined personality facet scores are commonly reported and used for making decisions in clinical and organizational settings. Although these facets are typically related, scoring is usually carried out for a single facet at a time. This method can be ineffective and time consuming when personality tests contain many highly correlated…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Personality Measures, Accuracy
Peer reviewedMcMinn, Mark R.; Ellens, Brent M.; Soref, Erez – Assessment, 1999
Surveyed 364 members of the Society for Personality Assessment to determine how they use computer-based test interpretation software (CBTI) in their work, and their perspectives on the ethics of using CBTI. Psychologists commonly use CBTI for test scoring, but not to formulate a case or as an alternative to a written report. (SLD)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Software, Ethics
