Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 3 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 4 |
Scoring | 4 |
Creative Thinking | 3 |
Creativity Tests | 3 |
Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
Creativity | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Algorithms | 1 |
Automation | 1 |
Computational Linguistics | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Creative Behavior | 4 |
Author
Buczak, Philip | 1 |
Daniel L. Schacter | 1 |
Denis Dumas | 1 |
Doebler, Philipp | 1 |
Emma R. Edenbaum | 1 |
Forthmann, Boris | 1 |
Huang, He | 1 |
Joshua D. Greene | 1 |
Mathias Benedek | 1 |
Peter Organisciak | 1 |
Roger E. Beaty | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Education Level
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Program for International… | 1 |
Torrance Tests of Creative… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Selcuk Acar; Peter Organisciak; Denis Dumas – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
In this three-study investigation, we applied various approaches to score drawings created in response to both Form A and Form B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Figural (broadly TTCT-F) as well as the Multi-Trial Creative Ideation task (MTCI). We focused on TTCT-F in Study 1, and utilizing a random forest classifier, we achieved 79% and…
Descriptors: Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Models, Correlation
William Orwig; Emma R. Edenbaum; Joshua D. Greene; Daniel L. Schacter – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2024
Recent developments in computerized scoring via semantic distance have provided automated assessments of verbal creativity. Here, we extend past work, applying computational linguistic approaches to characterize salient features of creative text. We hypothesize that, in addition to semantic diversity, the degree to which a story includes…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Creativity, Computational Linguistics
Buczak, Philip; Huang, He; Forthmann, Boris; Doebler, Philipp – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2023
Traditionally, researchers employ human raters for scoring responses to creative thinking tasks. Apart from the associated costs this approach entails two potential risks. First, human raters can be subjective in their scoring behavior (inter-rater-variance). Second, individual raters are prone to inconsistent scoring patterns…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Automation, Creative Thinking
Mathias Benedek; Roger E. Beaty – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
The PISA assessment 2022 of creative thinking was a moonshot effort that introduced significant advancements over existing creativity tests, including a broad range of domains (written, visual, social, and scientific), implementation in many languages, and sophisticated scoring methods. PISA 2022 demonstrated the general feasibility of assessing…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity, Creativity Tests, Scoring