Descriptor
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| Objective Tests | 1 |
| Response Style (Tests) | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| Test Format | 1 |
| Test Items | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Evaluation and the Health… | 1 |
Author
| Harasym, P. H. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHarasym, P. H.; And Others – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1980
Coded, as opposed to free response items, in a multiple choice physiology test had a cueing effect which raised students' scores, especially for lower achievers. Reliability of coded items was also lower. Item format and scoring method had an effect on test results. (GDC)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Cues, Higher Education
