Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
Computational Linguistics | 2 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
Computer Games | 2 |
Computer Software | 2 |
Evaluators | 2 |
Scoring | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Alex J. Mechaber | 1 |
Brian E. Clauser | 1 |
Denis Dumas | 1 |
Kai North | 1 |
Kelly Berthiaume | 1 |
Le An Ha | 1 |
Peter Baldwin | 1 |
Peter Organisciak | 1 |
Selcuk Acar | 1 |
Victoria Yaneva | 1 |
Yiyun Zhou | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Torrance Tests of Creative… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peter Baldwin; Victoria Yaneva; Kai North; Le An Ha; Yiyun Zhou; Alex J. Mechaber; Brian E. Clauser – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Recent developments in the use of large-language models have led to substantial improvements in the accuracy of content-based automated scoring of free-text responses. The reported accuracy levels suggest that automated systems could have widespread applicability in assessment. However, before they are used in operational testing, other aspects of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Scoring, Computational Linguistics, Accuracy
Selcuk Acar; Denis Dumas; Peter Organisciak; Kelly Berthiaume – Grantee Submission, 2024
Creativity is highly valued in both education and the workforce, but assessing and developing creativity can be difficult without psychometrically robust and affordable tools. The open-ended nature of creativity assessments has made them difficult to score, expensive, often imprecise, and therefore impractical for school- or district-wide use. To…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Elementary School Students, Artificial Intelligence, Measurement Techniques