NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
White, Mark C. – Educational Researcher, 2018
Raters must score accurately and consistently for classroom observation scores to be valid. This requires (a) a standard defining when scoring is accurate and consistent enough and (b) measuring and remediating rater performance against that standard. Current practice has focused on this second problem to the exclusion of the first. My goal here…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Standard Setting, Classroom Observation Techniques, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Verheggen, M. M.; Muijtjens, A. M. M.; Os, J. Van; Schuwirth, L. W. T. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2008
Background: To establish credible, defensible and acceptable passing scores for written tests is a challenge for health profession educators. Angoff procedures are often used to establish pass/fail decisions for written and performance tests. In an Angoff procedure judges' expertise and professional skills are assumed to influence their ratings of…
Descriptors: Health Occupations, Performance Tests, Scoring, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Myford, Carol M.; Wolfe, Edward W. – Journal of Applied Measurement, 2002
Examined a procedure for identifying and resolving discrepancies in ratings, focusing on the third rater adjudication procedure used in scoring the Test of Spoken English. Results for 1,446 adult examinees demonstrate that implementing a discrepancy resolution procedure is not sufficient in itself for quality control monitoring. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Evaluators, Quality Control, Scoring