NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rent, George S. – Educational Record, 1990
While the use of a search committee may be a more representative method, it may not be the most effective method for selecting a new president. The use of both a search consultant and a search committee permits the delegation of the "search" to the consultant and the "selection" to the committee. (MLW)
Descriptors: Administrator Selection, College Presidents, Confidentiality, Consultants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greenberg, Milton – Educational Record, 1988
Problems in the process of selecting new administrators are discussed, including confidentiality, resumes and letters of recommendation, the interview, committee membership, and inside candidates. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Selection, Confidentiality, Consultants, Employment Services
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lutz, Frank W. – Educational Record, 1979
Suggests that the complex process of appointing a dean could be conducted more objectively and effectively. The search processes of 32 colleges were examined and practices observed include: search committee's local orientation, committees excluded from final decision, communication problems with candidates and use of the old boy network. (MLW)
Descriptors: Administrator Characteristics, Administrator Qualifications, Administrator Selection, Advisory Committees
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greenwood, Janet D.; Ross, Marlene – Educational Record, 1996
College presidential search committees often measure candidates by two yardsticks: how close in complexity the candidate's current budget, personnel, and program responsibilities resemble those of the position under consideration, and the academic stature brought to the institution. Interest in nontraditional candidates is growing. Searches have…
Descriptors: Administrator Characteristics, Administrator Role, Administrator Selection, College Administration