Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 3 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 38 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 62 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 84 |
Descriptor
Error Correction | 100 |
Second Language Learning | 100 |
Written Language | 100 |
Feedback (Response) | 77 |
English (Second Language) | 66 |
Second Language Instruction | 66 |
Foreign Countries | 57 |
Teaching Methods | 35 |
Grammar | 28 |
Student Attitudes | 26 |
Instructional Effectiveness | 22 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Bitchener, John | 4 |
Choi, Bumyong | 2 |
Kim, Binna | 2 |
Kim, YouJin | 2 |
Knoch, Ute | 2 |
Kourtali, Nektaria-Efstathia | 2 |
Nassaji, Hossein | 2 |
Sheen, Younghee | 2 |
Wiboolyasarin, Watcharapol | 2 |
Yun, Hyunae | 2 |
Ahn, Soojin | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 33 |
Postsecondary Education | 28 |
Secondary Education | 11 |
Adult Education | 5 |
High Schools | 5 |
Middle Schools | 4 |
Elementary Education | 3 |
Junior High Schools | 3 |
Grade 10 | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Teachers | 1 |
Location
China | 8 |
Iran | 7 |
Turkey | 6 |
Canada | 5 |
Japan | 3 |
South Korea | 3 |
Spain | 3 |
Ethiopia | 2 |
Greece | 2 |
New Zealand | 2 |
South Korea (Seoul) | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
International English… | 1 |
Learning Style Inventory | 1 |
Motivated Strategies for… | 1 |
Myers Briggs Type Indicator | 1 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Miao, Jia; Chang, Jiangmei; Ma, Li – SAGE Open, 2023
Written corrective feedback in Second Language Writing is one of the most important parts in L2 Acquisition and Language Teaching. CiteSpace is a convenient and effective bibliometric analysis tool which is widely used by researchers to explore the development tends of a certain field. The Web of Science core collection database was used as the…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Trend Analysis, Written Language, Error Correction
Kim, YouJin; Choi, Bumyong; Yun, Hyunae; Kim, Binna; Choi, Sujeong – Language Teaching Research, 2022
Recently, there has been a shift in the perception of tasks. Tasks are no longer viewed as 'one-off' activities, and the importance of studying the role of task repetition has been increasingly addressed (Bygate, 2018). However, the way task repetition effects are mediated by other instructional conditions such as corrective feedback has not been…
Descriptors: Repetition, Synchronous Communication, Written Language, Error Correction
Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam – SAGE Open, 2024
Although, written corrective feedback (hereafter referred to as CF) is applauded in many writing courses for fostering students' quality writing, its impact on grammatical accuracy in L2 students' writing remains a debated topic. Thus, this study looked into the effect of CF types on L2 students' grammatical accuracy in writing. To achieve this…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Education, Written Language, Feedback (Response), Error Correction
Shen, Rongyi; Chong, Sin Wang – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Although research on the efficacy of written corrective feedback has received considerable attention in recent years, there is a dearth of research on learner engagement with written corrective feedback. Understanding how language learners engage with written corrective feedback is high on the agenda of feedback research because it provides a…
Descriptors: Learner Engagement, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Effects of Explicit Written Corrective Feedback on Subject-Verb Agreement among Kurdish EFL Students
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim; Aziz, Muhammad Abdulwahab – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2023
The research on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing has garnered considerable attention over the years, particularly concerning the impact of corrective feedback (CF) on students' errors. However, in the context of Kurdish EFL students, this area of research has received limited attention, despite its potential to enhance their grammatical…
Descriptors: Direct Instruction, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Investigating Learner Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback in a Thai Higher Education Context
Jinowat, Nattwut; Wiboolyasarin, Watcharapol – TEFLIN Journal: A publication on the teaching and learning of English, 2022
The current study investigated EFL learners' preferences for written corrective feedback (WCF) and the rationale for their preferences. A mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection, was used to explore this phenomenon. The data were collected using an internet-based questionnaire and a semi-structured interview.…
Descriptors: Preferences, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Barrot, Jessie S. – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2023
Despite the building up of research on the adoption of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems, the differential effects of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on errors with different severity levels and gains across writing tasks remain unclear. Thus, this study fills in the vacuum by examining how AWCF through Grammarly affects…
Descriptors: Automation, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Bowles, Melissa A.; Gastañaga, Kacie – Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2022
This study compares the processing of three different types of written corrective feedback (WCF) by heritage language (HL), second language (L2), and third language (L3) learners who wrote and revised three short essays and received a different type of WCF for each essay (i.e., direct, coding, or underlining). Comparison of pre- and post-feedback…
Descriptors: Native Language, Second Language Learning, Cognitive Processes, Written Language
Lee, Icy – Applied Linguistics, 2023
In English as an additional language writing, error correction or error feedback is most commonly referred to as 'written corrective feedback (WCF)'. The emphasis on 'correctness' in 'WCF' suggests native-speakerist standards or norms, which are controversial in an increasingly globalized world. In this Forum article, I discuss the problems…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, English Language Learners, Feedback (Response)
Miguel Blázquez-Carretero – ReCALL, 2023
In 2016, Lawley proposed an easy-to-build spellchecker specifically designed to help second language (L2) learners in their writing process by facilitating self-correction. The aim was to overcome the disadvantages to L2 learners posed by generic spellcheckers (GSC), such as that embedded in Microsoft Word. Drawbacks include autocorrection,…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Spanish, Spelling, Error Correction
McLellan, Gerry – Language Teaching, 2021
In her article, Icy Lee (2019, pp. 524-536) discusses the differences between comprehensive written corrective feedback (CWCF) and focused written corrective feedback (FWCF). She argues that teachers should concentrate more on focused feedback, and highlight and correct only a few grammar errors or issues with organisation, for example, instead of…
Descriptors: Written Language, Feedback (Response), Teaching Methods, Error Correction
Jalali, Hanan; Rahimi, Mohammad – Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 2022
Implicit theory (Dweck, 2000) suggests that learners' theories about the malleability of their individual traits (learning style, here) determine the extent to which they can stretch their learning style (Gregersen & MacIntyre, 2014; Young, 2010) and benefit from the instruction that mismatches their preferred styles. The present study aimed…
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Solmaz, Fatma; Tas, Songül; Kalin, Imran Mollaoglu – Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 2023
Written corrective feedback (WCF) is widely implemented in EFL writing classrooms; however, there is not consensus on how and to what extent it should be used. The controversial findings of the WCF studies reflected in teaching practices and perceptions of the practitioners on WCF, and many studies reported that there was an inconsistency between…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Written Language, Teacher Attitudes
Kiliçkaya, Ferit – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
Although a plethora of research has been conducted on written corrective feedback and timing of feedback in various teaching and learning contexts, there is a paucity of research on learners' preferences regarding different online written corrective feedback. Such a lacuna becomes prominent in EFL contexts, especially in grammar classes, where…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Language Teachers, Electronic Learning, Written Language
Criado, Raquel; Garcés-Manzanera, Aitor; Plonsky, Luke – Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2022
This study was motivated by Truscott's (1996, 2004) scarcely empirically tested claims that written corrective feedback (WCF) processing hinders fluency in subsequent rewriting owing to learners' purposeful avoidance of making mistakes by composing shorter texts at a higher speed. It examined the writing fluency of the texts produced by eighteen…
Descriptors: Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language)