Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 8 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 38 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 72 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 120 |
Descriptor
Grammar | 172 |
Second Language Learning | 172 |
Written Language | 172 |
Second Language Instruction | 87 |
English (Second Language) | 86 |
Foreign Countries | 61 |
Teaching Methods | 58 |
Oral Language | 54 |
Language Usage | 35 |
Native Language | 33 |
Task Analysis | 33 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Lee, Minjin | 3 |
Révész, Andrea | 3 |
Biber, Douglas | 2 |
Gray, Bethany | 2 |
Kim, YouJin | 2 |
Kourtali, Nektaria-Efstathia | 2 |
McCarthy, Michael | 2 |
Revesz, Andrea | 2 |
Suzuki, Wataru | 2 |
Yurtbasi, Metin | 2 |
A Aziz, Siti Farhah | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
Iran | 6 |
China | 5 |
Hong Kong | 4 |
Japan | 4 |
Australia | 3 |
Canada | 3 |
Greece | 3 |
California | 2 |
Italy | 2 |
New Zealand | 2 |
Norway | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
National Defense Education… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Test of English as a Foreign… | 6 |
Wechsler Individual… | 2 |
International English… | 1 |
Test of Written English | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Carla H. Consolini; Kristopher Kyle – Applied Linguistics, 2024
Research has demonstrated that features of lexical and lexicogrammatical use are important predictors of productive second language (L2) proficiency (e.g. Kyle et al. 2018). While some features of lexical use have been studied with L2s other than English (e.g. Tracy-Ventura 2017), multivariate lexical and lexicogrammatical approaches in these L2s…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Language Proficiency, Spanish, Written Language
Fawzi Eltayeb Yousuf Ahmed; Nawal Mosa Mohammed Abdallah; Sarah Osman Eltom Hamed; Fatima Mohamed Ali Hamed – Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2025
The current study attempts to explore and analyze errors of word choice made in written language by Saudi undergraduates at King Khalid University. It additionally tries to determine the probable sources of errors and provide remedies to them. The study focuses on word choice errors in four areas, viz., literal translation, collocation, subject…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Undergraduate Students
Kim, YouJin; Choi, Bumyong; Yun, Hyunae; Kim, Binna; Choi, Sujeong – Language Teaching Research, 2022
Recently, there has been a shift in the perception of tasks. Tasks are no longer viewed as 'one-off' activities, and the importance of studying the role of task repetition has been increasingly addressed (Bygate, 2018). However, the way task repetition effects are mediated by other instructional conditions such as corrective feedback has not been…
Descriptors: Repetition, Synchronous Communication, Written Language, Error Correction
Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam – SAGE Open, 2024
Although, written corrective feedback (hereafter referred to as CF) is applauded in many writing courses for fostering students' quality writing, its impact on grammatical accuracy in L2 students' writing remains a debated topic. Thus, this study looked into the effect of CF types on L2 students' grammatical accuracy in writing. To achieve this…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Education, Written Language, Feedback (Response), Error Correction
Effects of Explicit Written Corrective Feedback on Subject-Verb Agreement among Kurdish EFL Students
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim; Aziz, Muhammad Abdulwahab – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2023
The research on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing has garnered considerable attention over the years, particularly concerning the impact of corrective feedback (CF) on students' errors. However, in the context of Kurdish EFL students, this area of research has received limited attention, despite its potential to enhance their grammatical…
Descriptors: Direct Instruction, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Taichi Yamashita – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2024
The present paper reports on the effectiveness and inclusiveness of human-delivered synchronous written corrective feedback (SWCF) in paired writing tasks. Replicating Yamashita, Study 2 and Study 3 each conducted a classroom-based quasi-experimental study in an English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) writing program at an American university. In Study…
Descriptors: Synchronous Communication, Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Written Language
Apaloo, Marie; Cardoso, Walcir – Language Awareness, 2022
Possessive determiners (PDs) "his" and "her" are challenging for L2 learners to acquire, and this difficulty has been attributed to several factors, including negative L1 transfer effects (White et al., 2007). What researchers have not yet considered is how PDs are acquired by learners whose L1 predicts positive transfer…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Portuguese, Dialects, Second Language Learning
McLellan, Gerry – Language Teaching, 2021
In her article, Icy Lee (2019, pp. 524-536) discusses the differences between comprehensive written corrective feedback (CWCF) and focused written corrective feedback (FWCF). She argues that teachers should concentrate more on focused feedback, and highlight and correct only a few grammar errors or issues with organisation, for example, instead of…
Descriptors: Written Language, Feedback (Response), Teaching Methods, Error Correction
Jorge Villavicencio Reinoso – rEFLections, 2023
To date, there has been mounting research evidence on the impact of written corrective feedback. In response to this, reviews have been conducted to condense either findings or methodologies through the combined analysis of EFL and ESL studies. Although syntheses shed light on the topic, no one provides exclusive insights into EFL realities.…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning, English (Second Language)
Kiliçkaya, Ferit – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
Although a plethora of research has been conducted on written corrective feedback and timing of feedback in various teaching and learning contexts, there is a paucity of research on learners' preferences regarding different online written corrective feedback. Such a lacuna becomes prominent in EFL contexts, especially in grammar classes, where…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Language Teachers, Electronic Learning, Written Language
Yildiz, Funda Uzdu; Çetin, Betül – Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2020
The present study systematically reviewed research that was conducted to analyze the errors within the written expressions of individuals learning Turkish as a foreign language. The sample of the study consisted of 16 articles that were identified through the review of literature. The articles that focused on the written expression errors made by…
Descriptors: Error Patterns, Written Language, Turkish, Second Language Learning
Zalbidea, Janire – Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2021
Following calls for more modality-sensitive perspectives of SLA, this study investigated the extent to which (a) producing the second language (L2) in the oral modality impacts learner-generated noticing and L2 development of grammatical structures embedded in subsequent auditory input, and whether (b) engaging in L2 production and input…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Spanish, Oral Language, Written Language
Yanjiao Zhu; Peggy Mok – International Journal of Multilingualism, 2024
This study examines the production of third language (L3) German consonant clusters by 26 L1 Cantonese-L2 English bilinguals, with the aim of uncovering the possible cross-linguistic influences on L3 pronunciation. Learners' production of 17 onset and 21 coda German consonant clusters were auditorily analysed with respect to accuracy and error…
Descriptors: Phonemes, Pronunciation, Sino Tibetan Languages, English (Second Language)
Francesco Romano; Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes – International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2024
This study investigated three key issues in heritage language (HL) research. Previous research shows HL speakers have an advantage on oral production tasks compared to L2 speakers who instead perform better on written tasks. Furthermore, both L2 and HL speakers are claimed to have a "yes-bias" towards retaining ungrammaticality in GJTs.…
Descriptors: Bilingualism, Heritage Education, Reaction Time, Second Language Learning
Hyunjung An – ProQuest LLC, 2020
The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) in a Korean as a foreign language (KFL) context. The assumption that indirect feedback (IF) is more effective for L2 learners with higher-proficiency levels has yet to be fully corroborated, which necessitates substantial research-based…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Written Language, Error Correction, Korean