Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
English (Second Language) | 3 |
Psychological Testing | 3 |
Second Language Learning | 3 |
Second Language Instruction | 2 |
Validity | 2 |
Contrastive Linguistics | 1 |
Cultural Differences | 1 |
Culture Fair Tests | 1 |
Cutting Scores | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Chapelle, Carol A. | 1 |
Crick, Ruth | 1 |
Enright, Mary K. | 1 |
Huang, Shaofu | 1 |
Jamieson, Joan | 1 |
Kutlu, Omer | 1 |
Ozdemir, Hasan Fehmi | 1 |
Suthathip Thirakunkovit | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Turkey (Ankara) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Suthathip Thirakunkovit – Language Testing in Asia, 2025
Establishing a cut score is a crucial aspect of the test development process since the selected cut score has the potential to impact students' performance outcomes and shape instructional strategies within the classroom. Therefore, it is vital for those involved in test development to set a cut score that is both fair and justifiable. This cut…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Culture Fair Tests, Language Tests, Test Construction
Ozdemir, Hasan Fehmi; Kutlu, Omer; Huang, Shaofu; Crick, Ruth – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2022
The aim of this study is to adapt the Crick Learning for Resilient Agency (CLARA) to Turkish culture, and to examine the psychometric features of the Inventory according to both Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). In this respect, it is a descriptive level survey design research. Two different study groups were formed in…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Psychometrics, English (Second Language), English Literature
Chapelle, Carol A.; Enright, Mary K.; Jamieson, Joan – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2010
Drawing on experience between 2000 and 2007 in developing a validity argument for the high-stakes Test of English as a "Foreign Language[TM]" (TOEFL[R]), this paper evaluates the differences between the argument-based approach to validity as presented by "Kane (2006)" and that described in the 1999 "AERA/APA/NCME Standards for Educational and…
Descriptors: Psychological Testing, Validity, High Stakes Tests, English (Second Language)