Descriptor
Readability Formulas | 4 |
Secondary Education | 4 |
Test Reliability | 4 |
Reading Research | 3 |
Test Validity | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Readability | 2 |
Textbooks | 2 |
Adolescents | 1 |
Books | 1 |
Cloze Procedure | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Algozzine, Kate | 1 |
Guidry, Loyd J. | 1 |
Keenan, Donna | 1 |
Knight, D. Frances | 1 |
LaSasso, Carol | 1 |
Turner, Edward C. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Keenan, Donna – Reading Horizons, 1982
Suggests that the popular and simple readability formulas may not be accurate enough to predict the instructional materials best suited to the reading abilities of secondary school students. (FL)
Descriptors: Readability Formulas, Reading Research, Secondary Education, Test Reliability

LaSasso, Carol – American Annals of the Deaf, 1980
Although the cloze procedure was shown to be satisfactorily reliable with deaf Ss, cloze scores did not relate to the predicted passage difficulty; therefore, the validity of the cloze procedure as a readability measure was not confirmed. (Author/DLS)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Cloze Procedure, Deafness, Evaluation Methods

Turner, Edward C.; Algozzine, Kate – Clearing House, 1985
Reports findings of a study that examined the extent to which the variability observed in reading levels of common junior high textbooks was also present in four popular high school social studies texts. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Diagnosis

Guidry, Loyd J.; Knight, D. Frances – Journal of Reading, 1976
Describes an adjustment factor which makes readability formulas more accurate. (RB)
Descriptors: Books, Evaluation Methods, Literature Reviews, Measurement Instruments