Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Admission Criteria | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Disproportionate… | 1 |
| Efficiency | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Equal Education | 1 |
| Excellence in Education | 1 |
| Gifted | 1 |
| High Achievement | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Roeper Review | 1 |
Author
| Dai, David Yun | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Gratz et al v Bollinger et al | 1 |
| Grutter et al v Bollinger et… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Otis Lennon School Ability… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDai, David Yun – Roeper Review, 2013
Gifted education is often faulted as compromising the principle of equity and perpetuating social inequalities. This article focuses on making gifted education socially defensible and educationally productive. To accomplish this goal, key values and priorities guiding policy and practice, such as excellence, selectivity, diversity, equity and…
Descriptors: Social Justice, Excellence in Education, Gifted, Efficiency
