NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hanan Khalil; Fiona Campbell; Katrina Danial; Danielle Pollock; Zachary Munn; Vivian Welsh; Ashrita Saran; Dimi Hoppe; Andrea C. Tricco – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
This scoping review aims to identify and systematically review published mapping reviews to assess their commonality and heterogeneity and determine whether additional efforts should be made to standardise methodology and reporting. The following databases were searched; Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Campbell collaboration database,…
Descriptors: Databases, Citations (References), Research Reports, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhipeng Hou; Elizabeth Tipton – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Literature screening is the process of identifying all relevant records from a pool of candidate paper records in systematic review, meta-analysis, and other research synthesis tasks. This process is time consuming, expensive, and prone to human error. Screening prioritization methods attempt to help reviewers identify most relevant records while…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Research Reports, Identification, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Polanin, Joshua R.; Pigott, Terri D.; Espelage, Dorothy L.; Grotpeter, Jennifer K. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Abstract screening is one important aspect of conducting a high-quality and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Abstract screening allows the review team to conduct the tedious but vital first step to synthesize the extant literature: winnowing down the overwhelming amalgamation of citations discovered through research databases to…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Citations (References), Documentation, Databases
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Westgate, Martin J. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
The field of evidence synthesis is growing rapidly, with a corresponding increase in the number of software tools and workflows to support the construction of systematic reviews, systematic maps, and meta-analyses. Despite much progress, however, a number of problems remain, including slow integration of new statistical or methodological…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Statistical Analysis, Meta Analysis, Users (Information)