Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Predictor Variables | 2 |
| Regression (Statistics) | 2 |
| Selection Criteria | 2 |
| Selection Tools | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academic Persistence | 1 |
| Admission Criteria | 1 |
| Algebra | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Calculus | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Mullet, Luke B. | 1 |
| Poole, Phillippa | 1 |
| Rudland, Joy | 1 |
| Showalter, Daniel A. | 1 |
| Shulruf, Boaz | 1 |
| Wang, Grace Ying | 1 |
| Wilkinson, Tim | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkShowalter, Daniel A.; Mullet, Luke B. – Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 2017
Selection bias is a persistent, and often hidden, problem in educational research. It is the primary obstacle standing in between increasingly available large education datasets and the ability to make valid causal inferences to inform policymaking, research, and practice (Stuart, 2010). This article provides an accessible discussion on the…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Selection Criteria, Selection Tools, Bias
Shulruf, Boaz; Poole, Phillippa; Wang, Grace Ying; Rudland, Joy; Wilkinson, Tim – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2012
The choice of tools with which to select medical students is complex and controversial. This study aimed to identify the extent to which scores on each of three admission tools (Admission GPA, UMAT and structured interview) predicted the outcomes of the first major clinical year (Y4) of a 6 year medical programme. Data from three student cohorts…
Descriptors: Medical Students, Medical Schools, Clinical Teaching (Health Professions), Structured Interviews
