Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Behavior Standards | 2 |
| Cheating | 2 |
| Self Concept | 2 |
| Attribution Theory | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| Competence | 1 |
| Engineering Education | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Knowledge Level | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Amber M. Henslee | 1 |
| Gayla R. Olbricht | 1 |
| Luke Settles | 1 |
| Sara E. Johnson | 1 |
| Solodky, Maurice | 1 |
| Vallacher, Robin R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textAmber M. Henslee; Luke Settles; Sara E. Johnson; Gayla R. Olbricht – Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 2025
Academic dishonesty and how to address it are common concerns across higher education disciplines, but engineering students admit to higher rates of academic dishonesty than other students. However, first-year students may be particularly receptive to prevention efforts. Considering self-perception, social norming, and behavioral choice theories,…
Descriptors: Ethics, Cheating, Self Concept, Peer Influence
Peer reviewedVallacher, Robin R.; Solodky, Maurice – Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1979
Undergraduate subjects were given an opportunity to cheat undetected on puzzle problems. The hypotheses were confirmed that more cheating occurred under ability attribution conditions than under luck attribution conditions; this effect of performance attribution was greater among self-aware subjects than among non-self-aware subjects. (Author/MH)
Descriptors: Attribution Theory, Behavior Standards, Cheating, Cognitive Ability
