NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stebbings, Paul; Stone, Gerald L. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1977
The study examined the attribution of responsibility of 34 students with an internal or external locus of control following success or failure feedback on a communication task. Results indicated externals attribute more responsibility to impersonal external sources than do internals. The importance of attributional processes for counseling is…
Descriptors: Attribution Theory, College Students, Locus of Control, Psychological Characteristics
Frieze, Irene Hanson; And Others – 1976
Examined were causal attributions for women and men and sports participation. In accord with previous academic research, athletes of both sexes were expected to attribute successes more to their abilities and efforts and failures to lack of effort, as compared to a group of non-athletes. Also examined was the differential use of team and…
Descriptors: Athletes, Athletics, Attribution Theory, Beliefs
Derry, Paul A.; Stone, Gerald L. – 1978
This study examined the contribution of cognitively-oriented adjunct treatments to assertive training. Unassertive university students (N=42) were randomly assigned within an analysis of covariance design with three levels of treatment (Cognitive Self-Statement Training (CSST), Attribution Training (AT), and Behavioral Rehearsal (BR]. Multiple…
Descriptors: Assertiveness, Attribution Theory, Behavior Change, Cognitive Objectives
Kearney, Maureen J.; Kearney, James F. – 1977
The Internal-External (I-E) Locus of Control scale (Rotter, 1966) was administered to 185 male and 185 female university students. The resulting scores were factored, producing two factors for males and four for females. The male factors were the generally-accepted "luck" and "powerful others"; for women, however, the "powerful others" dimension…
Descriptors: Attribution Theory, College Students, Females, Individual Power
Tetlock, Philip E. – 1979
In an impression explanation of counterdefensive attributions, the tendency of subjects is to accept primary responsibility for negative outcomes and to deny credit for positive outcomes. Counterdefensive attributions represent attempts at maximizing the esteem in which observers hold the actor. To test this hypothesis, a 2 x 5 simulation was…
Descriptors: Adults, Attribution Theory, Behavioral Science Research, Failure