NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pexman, Penny M.; Yap, Melvin J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2018
Most previous studies of semantic processing have examined group-level data. We investigated the possibility that there might be individual differences in semantic decision performance even among the standard undergraduate population and that such differences might provide insights into semantic processing. We analyzed the Calgary Semantic…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Semantics, Language Processing, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Muraki, Emiko J.; Pexman, Penny M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
In embodied theories of semantic representation, the processes and mechanisms of modal simulations that are engaged during semantic processing have tended to be underspecified. We investigated the possibility that motor imagery may be a mechanism of simulation, using an individual differences approach. In this preregistered study, we assessed…
Descriptors: Semantics, Language Processing, Individual Differences, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Siakaluk, Paul D.; Knol, Nathan; Pexman, Penny M. – Cognitive Science, 2014
In this study, we examined the effects of emotional experience, a relatively new dimension of emotional knowledge that gauges the ease with which words evoke emotional experience, on abstract word processing in the Stroop task. In order to test the context-dependency of these effects, we accentuated the saliency of this dimension in Experiment 1A…
Descriptors: Emotional Experience, Task Analysis, Semantics, Visual Stimuli
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hargreaves, Ian S.; White, Michelle; Pexman, Penny M.; Pittman, Dan; Goodyear, Brad G. – Brain and Language, 2012
Task effects in semantic processing were investigated by contrasting the neural activation associated with two semantic categorization tasks (SCT) using event-related fMRI. The two SCTs involved different decision categories: "is it an animal?" vs. "is it a concrete thing?" Participants completed both tasks and, across participants, the same core…
Descriptors: Semantics, Language Processing, Correlation, Brain Hemisphere Functions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lupker, Stephen J.; Pexman, Penny M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
Performance in a lexical decision task is crucially dependent on the difficulty of the word-nonword discrimination. More wordlike nonwords cause not only a latency increase for words but also, as reported by Stone and Van Orden (1993), larger word frequency effects. Several current models of lexical decision making can explain these types of…
Descriptors: Semantics, Language Processing, Word Frequency, Semiotics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Siakaluk, Paul D.; Pexman, Penny M.; Aguilera, Laura; Owen, William J.; Sears, Christopher R. – Cognition, 2008
We examined the effects of sensorimotor experience in two visual word recognition tasks. Body-object interaction (BOI) ratings were collected for a large set of words. These ratings assess perceptions of the ease with which a human body can physically interact with a word's referent. A set of high BOI words (e.g., "mask") and a set of low BOI…
Descriptors: Semantics, Systems Approach, Interaction, Word Recognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Siakaluk, Paul D.; Pexman, Penny M.; Sears, Christopher R.; Owen, William J. – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2007
The ambiguity disadvantage (slower processing of ambiguous words relative to unambiguous words) has been taken as evidence for a distributed semantic representational system like that embodied in parallel distributed processing (PDP) models. In the present study, we investigated whether semantic ambiguity slows meaning activation, as PDP models…
Descriptors: Semantics, Figurative Language, Language Processing, Semiotics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hala, Suzanne; Pexman, Penny M.; Glenwright, Melanie – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2007
Two explanations for deficits underlying autism were tested: weak central coherence (WCC) and executive dysfunction. Consistent with WCC, Happe ("British Journal of Developmental Psychology" 15 (1997) 1) found that children with autism failed to use sentence context in pronouncing homographs. In an alternate approach, we investigated whether…
Descriptors: Semantics, Developmental Psychology, Autism, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Siakaluk, Paul D.; Pexman, Penny M.; Sears, Christopher R.; Wilson, Kim; Locheed, Keri; Owen, William J. – Cognitive Science, 2008
This article examined the effects of body-object interaction (BOI) on semantic processing. BOI measures perceptions of the ease with which a human body can physically interact with a word's referent. In Experiment 1, BOI effects were examined in 2 semantic categorization tasks (SCT) in which participants decided if words are easily imageable.…
Descriptors: Semantics, Interaction, Human Body, Semiotics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hino, Yasushi; Pexman, Penny M.; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2006
According to parallel distributed processing (PDP) models of visual word recognition, the speed of semantic coding is modulated by the nature of the orthographic-to-semantic mappings. Consistent with this idea, an ambiguity disadvantage and a relatedness-of-meaning (ROM) advantage have been reported in some word recognition tasks in which semantic…
Descriptors: Semantics, Language Processing, Word Recognition, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pexman, Penny M.; Hino, Yasushi; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2004
An ambiguity disadvantage (slower responses for ambiguous words, e.g., bank, than for unambiguous words) has been reported in semantic tasks (L. R. Gottlob, S. D. Goldinger, G. O. Stone, & G. C. Van Orden, 1999; Y. Hino, S. J. Lupker, & P. M. Pexman, 2002; C. D. Piercey & S. Joordens, 2000) and has been attributed to the meaning activation…
Descriptors: Semantics, Word Recognition, Figurative Language, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Holyk, Gregory G.; Pexman, Penny M. – Brain and Language, 2004
Lukatela and Turvey (2000) demonstrated a phonological priming effect in the lexical decision task (LDT) with a 14-ms prime and concluded that phonology plays a central role in word meaning activation. In contrast, several other researchers reported that phonological priming is significant only at much longer prime durations (e.g., Ferrand &…
Descriptors: Phonology, Individual Differences, Semantics, Cognitive Processes