Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Creativity Tests | 3 |
Natural Language Processing | 3 |
Semantics | 3 |
Automation | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Alternative Assessment | 1 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
Creative Thinking | 1 |
Cues | 1 |
Difficulty Level | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Badia, Toni | 1 |
Denis Dumas | 1 |
Huber, David E. | 1 |
Kelly Berthiaume | 1 |
Klein, Ariel | 1 |
Peter Organisciak | 1 |
Selcuk Acar | 1 |
Smith, Kevin A. | 1 |
Vul, Edward | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Remote Associates Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peter Organisciak; Selcuk Acar; Denis Dumas; Kelly Berthiaume – Grantee Submission, 2023
Automated scoring for divergent thinking (DT) seeks to overcome a key obstacle to creativity measurement: the effort, cost, and reliability of scoring open-ended tests. For a common test of DT, the Alternate Uses Task (AUT), the primary automated approach casts the problem as a semantic distance between a prompt and the resulting idea in a text…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Creative Thinking
Klein, Ariel; Badia, Toni – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2015
In this study we show how complex creative relations can arise from fairly frequent semantic relations observed in everyday language. By doing this, we reflect on some key cognitive aspects of linguistic and general creativity. In our experimentation, we automated the process of solving a battery of Remote Associates Test tasks. By applying…
Descriptors: Language Usage, Semantics, Natural Language Processing, Test Items
Smith, Kevin A.; Huber, David E.; Vul, Edward – Cognition, 2013
Many important problems require consideration of multiple constraints, such as choosing a job based on salary, location, and responsibilities. We used the Remote Associates Test to study how people solve such multiply-constrained problems by asking participants to make guesses as they came to mind. We evaluated how people generated these guesses…
Descriptors: Problem Solving, Creativity Tests, Natural Language Processing, Cues