NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scaltritti, Michele; Peressotti, Francesca; Navarrete, Eduardo – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
When speakers name multiple semantically related items, opposing effects can be found. Semantic facilitation is found when naming 2 semantically related items in a row. In contrast, semantic interference is found when speakers name semantically related items separated by 1 or more intervening unrelated items. This latter form of interference is…
Descriptors: Semantics, Naming, Interference (Learning), Priming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Davis, Danielle K.; Abrams, Lise – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
When people read questions like "How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the ark?", many mistakenly answer "2" despite knowing that Noah sailed the ark. This "Moses illusion" occurs when names share semantic features. Two experiments examined whether shared "visual" concepts (facial features)…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Semantics, Visual Stimuli, Interference (Learning)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hudson Kam, Carla L. – Language Learning and Development, 2018
Adult learners know that language is for communicating and that there are patterns in the language that need to be learned. This affects the way they engage with language input; they search for form-meaning linkages, and this effortful engagement could interfere with their learning, especially for things like grammatical gender that often have at…
Descriptors: Infants, Adult Learning, Grammar, Language Patterns
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gambi, Chiara; Van de Cavey, Joris; Pickering, Martin J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
In 4 experiments we showed that picture naming latencies are affected by beliefs about the task concurrently performed by another speaker. Participants took longer to name pictures when they believed that their partner concurrently named pictures than when they believed their partner was silent (Experiments 1 and 4) or concurrently categorized the…
Descriptors: Interference (Learning), Barriers, Pictorial Stimuli, Naming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Heyman, Tom; Van Rensbergen, Bram; Storms, Gert; Hutchison, Keith A.; De Deyne, Simon – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
The present research examines the nature of the different processes that have been proposed to underlie semantic priming. Specifically, it has been argued that priming arises as a result of "automatic target activation" and/or the use of strategies like prospective "expectancy generation" and "retrospective semantic…
Descriptors: Short Term Memory, Semantics, Priming, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Isberner, Maj-Britt; Richter, Tobias – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2014
Whether information is routinely and nonstrategically evaluated for truth during comprehension is still a point of contention. Previous studies supporting the assumption of nonstrategic validation have used a Stroop-like paradigm in which participants provided yes/no judgments in tasks unrelated to the truth or plausibility of the experimental…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Validity, Evaluative Thinking, Semantics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonker, Tanya R.; MacLeod, Colin M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
McDaniel and Bugg (2008) proposed that relatively uncommon stimuli and encoding tasks encourage elaborative encoding of individual items (item-specific processing), whereas relatively typical or common encoding tasks encourage encoding of associations among list items (relational processing). It is this relational processing that is thought to…
Descriptors: Memory, Cognitive Processes, Semantics, Interference (Learning)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ishii, Tomoko – Language Teaching Research, 2015
It has been repeatedly argued among vocabulary researchers that semantically related words should not be taught simultaneously because they can interfere with each other. However, the question of what types of relatedness cause interference has rarely been examined carefully. In addition, there are disagreements among the past studies that have…
Descriptors: Semantics, Memory, Vocabulary Development, Interference (Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Spataro, Pietro; Mulligan, Neil W.; Rossi-Arnaud, Clelia – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Distraction during encoding has long been known to disrupt later memory performance. Contrary to this long-standing result, we show that detecting an infrequent target in a dual-task paradigm actually improves memory encoding for a concurrently presented word, above and beyond the performance reached in the full-attention condition. This absolute…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Cognitive Processes, Memory, Attention