NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lin, Chien-Jer Charles; Ahrens, Kathleen – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2010
This paper revisits the effect of lexical ambiguity in word recognition, which has been controversial as previous research reported advantage, disadvantage, and null effects. We discuss factors that were not consistently treated in previous research (e.g., the level of lexical ambiguity investigated, parts of speech of the experimental stimuli,…
Descriptors: Semantics, Nouns, Figurative Language, Word Recognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huang, Yi Ting; Gordon, Peter C. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
How does prior context influence lexical and discourse-level processing during real-time language comprehension? Experiment 1 examined whether the referential ambiguity introduced by a repeated, anaphoric expression had an immediate or delayed effect on lexical and discourse processing, using an eye-tracking-while-reading task. Eye movements…
Descriptors: Comprehension, Eye Movements, Figurative Language, Human Body
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barnhart, Anthony S.; Goldinger, Stephen D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010
Handwritten word recognition is a field of study that has largely been neglected in the psychological literature, despite its prevalence in society. Whereas studies of spoken word recognition almost exclusively employ natural, human voices as stimuli, studies of visual word recognition use synthetic typefaces, thus simplifying the process of word…
Descriptors: Handwriting, Word Recognition, Figurative Language, Reader Text Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Faust, Miriam; Ben-Artzi, Elisheva; Harel, Itay – Brain and Language, 2008
Previous research suggests that the left hemisphere (LH) focuses on strongly related word meanings; the right hemisphere (RH) may contribute uniquely to the processing of lexical ambiguity by activating and maintaining a wide range of meanings, including subordinate meanings. The present study used the word-lists false memory paradigm [Roediger,…
Descriptors: Brain Hemisphere Functions, Semantics, Figurative Language, Word Recognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Siakaluk, Paul D.; Pexman, Penny M.; Sears, Christopher R.; Owen, William J. – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2007
The ambiguity disadvantage (slower processing of ambiguous words relative to unambiguous words) has been taken as evidence for a distributed semantic representational system like that embodied in parallel distributed processing (PDP) models. In the present study, we investigated whether semantic ambiguity slows meaning activation, as PDP models…
Descriptors: Semantics, Figurative Language, Language Processing, Semiotics
Grindrod, C.M.; Baum, S.R. – Brain and Cognition, 2005
In the present study, a cross-modal semantic priming task was used to investigate the ability of left-hemisphere-damaged (LHD) nonfluent aphasic, right-hemisphere-damaged (RHD) and non-brain-damaged (NBD) control subjects to use a discourse context to resolve lexically ambiguous words. Subjects first heard four-sentence discourse passages ending…
Descriptors: Semantics, Patients, Figurative Language, Aphasia
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hino, Yasushi; Pexman, Penny M.; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2006
According to parallel distributed processing (PDP) models of visual word recognition, the speed of semantic coding is modulated by the nature of the orthographic-to-semantic mappings. Consistent with this idea, an ambiguity disadvantage and a relatedness-of-meaning (ROM) advantage have been reported in some word recognition tasks in which semantic…
Descriptors: Semantics, Language Processing, Word Recognition, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pexman, Penny M.; Hino, Yasushi; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2004
An ambiguity disadvantage (slower responses for ambiguous words, e.g., bank, than for unambiguous words) has been reported in semantic tasks (L. R. Gottlob, S. D. Goldinger, G. O. Stone, & G. C. Van Orden, 1999; Y. Hino, S. J. Lupker, & P. M. Pexman, 2002; C. D. Piercey & S. Joordens, 2000) and has been attributed to the meaning activation…
Descriptors: Semantics, Word Recognition, Figurative Language, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rodd, Jennifer M.; Gaskell, M. Gareth; Marslen-Wilson, William D. – Cognitive Science, 2004
Most words in English are ambiguous between different interpretations; words can mean different things in different contexts. We investigate the implications of different types of semantic ambiguity for connectionist models of word recognition. We present a model in which there is competition to activate distributed semantic representations. The…
Descriptors: Semantics, Word Recognition, Figurative Language, English
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Woollams, Anna M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005
A current area of controversy within the literature on visual word recognition concerns the extent to which semantic information influences the computation of phonology. Experiment 1 revealed that both the imageability effect and the ambiguity advantage seen in the speeded naming task are confined to words with atypical mappings between spelling…
Descriptors: Semantics, Phonology, Figurative Language, Word Recognition