Descriptor
Group Dynamics | 38 |
Sensitivity Training | 38 |
Laboratory Training | 24 |
Interaction Process Analysis | 17 |
Training Laboratories | 17 |
Interpersonal Relationship | 9 |
Human Relations | 8 |
Interpersonal Competence | 6 |
Trainers | 6 |
Group Behavior | 5 |
Group Experience | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Small Group Behavior | 8 |
J Appl Behav Sci | 2 |
Journal of Applied Behavioral… | 2 |
Group and Organization Studies | 1 |
High Sch J | 1 |
J Home Econ | 1 |
Personnel and Guidance Journal | 1 |
School Counselor | 1 |
Training and Development… | 1 |
Author
Lundgren, David C. | 2 |
Smith, Peter B. | 2 |
Blumberg, Arthur | 1 |
Bolman, Lee | 1 |
Bradford, Leland P. | 1 |
Brown, George Isaac | 1 |
Brown, Glen J. | 1 |
Brown, Steven R. | 1 |
Cross, Gail | 1 |
Culbert, Samuel A. | 1 |
D'Augelli, Anthony R. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Books | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nadler, Eugene B.; Fink, Stephen L. – J Appl Behav Sci, 1970
To learn if the experience of small group democracy in a training laboratory generalizes to the more broadly theoretical issues of ideology, a before and after experimental design was utilized at a college training laboratory to gather more direct information. Results showed highly significant shifts in democratic directions on each of four scales…
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Attitudes, Group Dynamics, Laboratory Training
Hurley, John R.; Force, Elizabeth J. – 1971
This is the report of a "human relations" lab which was held on a rural estate where the staff and participants lived for eight days. Both six months after and five weeks before participation in this intensive T-group experience, the participants were described by themselves, one intimate, and one colleague on a variety of personality measures…
Descriptors: Behavioral Sciences, Group Dynamics, Groups, Interaction Process Analysis

Smith, Peter B. – Small Group Behavior, 1987
Assessed outcome in 10 British and American sensitivity training workshops in terms of reported self-benefit and benefit to one's relations with others not present. Found differing patterns of change between the two outcome variables, suggesting that they embody separate models of workshop learning processes. (Author/NB)
Descriptors: Change, Evaluation Criteria, Foreign Countries, Group Dynamics

Bolman, Lee – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
Among the effects of trainers on their T Groups was that trainer empathy and security were related to liking for the trainer and perceived member learning. Trainer affection, tendencies to reward and punish, and openess showed no or little relationship to participant learning. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Empathy, Group Dynamics, Human Relations
Lundberg, Joan, Lundberg, Craig – Training and Development Journal, 1974
The authors promote the position that the benefits tend to exceed the pitfalls of dual facilitation of intense small group experience and should become a more standard feature of laboratory training, for reasons of new trainer development, better learning experience for participants, and continuing skill development of experienced trainers. (AJ)
Descriptors: Cocounseling, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Laboratory Training
Fitzelle, George T. – J Home Econ, 1969
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Experience, Home Economics, Home Management

Kegan, Daniel L. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Describes a research project examining non-professional knowledge of and attitudes to sensitivity training groups. A questionnaire was distributed to college students, police officers and members of a group dynamics class. Results indicate that all three groups had fairly positive attitudes towards sensitivity training. (NG)
Descriptors: College Students, Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis

Lundgren, David C.; Knight, David J. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Examines the role of interpersonal needs for control and affection in influencing members' attitudinal reactions to the trainer and the group. Results indicate no support for the two-stage, authority-intimacy sequence suggested by much of the research on group development. (Author)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Helping Relationship
Miller, Nod – 1986
In recent years there has been some evidence of a resurgence of interest in experiential groupwork methods such as T-groups among cooperative and community development workers, feminists, and those concerned with heightening sensitivity to social problems. Two adult educators who believed that experiential laboratory methods can enable students to…
Descriptors: Adult Education, Developed Nations, Experiential Learning, Foreign Countries
Watson, Eugene R. – High Sch J, 1969
Descriptors: Behavior Development, Communication (Thought Transfer), Group Behavior, Group Dynamics
Sanders, Janet S. – 1977
In training facilitators for laboratory groups, also known as T-groups or encounter groups, the majority of group facilitators and therapists advocate an experiential apprenticeship in an ongoing group. However, the actions of an inexperienced facilitator trainee may have a negative effect upon the members of the group. The author experimented…
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence

Brown, Steven R.; Rothenberg, Albert – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This paper uses the Interpersonal Perception Method (IPM) to analyze a single episode in a group's experience. The authors feel that such an approach is much more useful than the more usual trait analysis in understanding those experiences which will mediate the group's functioning. (NG)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Individual Characteristics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence

Eddy, William B.; Lubin, Bernard – Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1971
This article reviews developments in the small group training field, provides a brief historical perspective on group training and working definitions for some of the more frequently mentioned types of small groups and comments on research on professional and ethical issues. Comment by James D. Beck follows. (Author/CJ)
Descriptors: Counselor Role, Group Dynamics, Group Experience, History
American Association of School Administrators, Washington, DC. – 1969
This compilation lists 24 abstracts of ERIC documents related to human relations training in education that have been announced in Research in Education (RIE) through June 1969. The following information is presented for each document: (1) The basic bibliographic data (including author, title, place of publication, publisher, publication data, and…
Descriptors: Abstracts, Annotated Bibliographies, Educational Administration, Group Dynamics

Miller, Fredrick D. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Group trainees often note that their group experience is perceived as a cultural alternative, resulting in difficulties transferring their learning to their everyday world. This paper examines these issues from a social psychological perspective. (NG)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Unity, Individual Development, Interaction Process Analysis