Descriptor
Sex Differences | 10 |
Validity | 10 |
Personality Measures | 7 |
College Students | 4 |
Factor Analysis | 4 |
Feedback | 3 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Attitudes | 2 |
Personality Theories | 2 |
Psychological Testing | 2 |
Rating Scales | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Psychological Reports | 3 |
Measurement and Evaluation in… | 2 |
Journal of Clinical Psychology | 1 |
Journal of Counseling &… | 1 |
Journal of Genetic Psychology | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Adjective Check List | 1 |
NEO Five Factor Inventory | 1 |
State Trait Anxiety Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Balance, William D. G.; And Others – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Attitudes, Behavioral Science Research, Diagnostic Tests, Feedback

Brown, Michael T.; Duren, Paula S. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1988
Employed confirmatory and exploratory factor analytic methods to test the hypothesis that Spielberger's revised four-factor model of anxiety was valid for characterizing the anxiety of Blacks. Administered the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory to 182 Black adults. Confirmed the state-trait assertion, but not the four-factor model of anxiety-present…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Blacks, Factor Analysis, Personality Measures

Schaefer, Charles E. – Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1973
Descriptors: Adolescents, Creativity, Followup Studies, Personality Development

Tokar, David M.; Fischer, Ann R.; Snell, Andrea F.; Harik-Williams, Nahla – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1999
Results of confirmatory and exploratory analyses of 485 nonstudent adults' (N=485) responses to the NEO Five-Factor Inventory indicate that a six-factor model best fit the data. Results show some empirical justification for using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory to assess clients' and research participants' core personality traits. (Author/MKA)
Descriptors: Adults, Data Analysis, Factor Analysis, Models

Jackson, Donald E.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982
Tested college students (N=153) with one of four personality tests differing in face validity. Subjects received either a bogus interpretation (Barnum) or negative interpretation (Prosecuting Attorney). Barnum feedback was judged more accurate and likeable. Females had higher accuracy scores. Results confirmed findings relative to face validity…
Descriptors: College Students, Credibility, Feedback, Higher Education

Pedhazur, Elazar J. – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Attitudes, Difficulty Level, Dogmatism, Factor Analysis

Abbott, Robert D. – Psychological Reports, 1970
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis, Individual Differences

Betz, Nancy E.; And Others – Journal of Counseling & Development, 1995
Evaluates a measure of unconditional self-regard (USR) in four theories. Results indicated that USR was highly reliable and was strongly related to other measures of self-esteem and negatively related to depression, anxiety, and symptoms of psychological distress. Evidence for discriminant validity was provided by findings that USR was unrelated…
Descriptors: College Students, Evaluation, Higher Education, Personality Measures
Sage, Ellis H. – 1970
This is a report on further construct validation of the Sage Developmental Scales for the late adolescent period which intends to make these scales more useful to counselors of college freshmen. This study is also a further step in clarifying the dimensions measured by the Developmental Scales through the use of trait adjectives. It was…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Counseling, Development, Individual Characteristics
Beins, Bernard C. – 1991
The Barnum Effect was generated to teach students about the ethics of deception in research and the feelings of subjects who are deceived. The Barnum Effect occurs when individuals are duped into believing invalid results of psychological tests. People are most accepting when given favorable feedback about themselves. They interpret evaluations as…
Descriptors: College Students, Deception, Ethical Instruction, Ethics