Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Psychometrics | 2 |
| Shift Studies | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Perception | 1 |
| Predictor Variables | 1 |
| Program Improvement | 1 |
| Reader Response | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Garrigan, Patrick | 2 |
| Kellman, Philip J. | 2 |
| Shipley, Thomas F. | 2 |
| Keane, Brian P. | 1 |
| Machado, Liana | 1 |
| Yin, Carol | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKellman, Philip J.; Garrigan, Patrick; Shipley, Thomas F.; Keane, Brian P. – Psychological Review, 2007
Presents some additional comments from the current authors regarding their original article Interpolation processes in object perception: Reply to Anderson (2007). As this exchange concludes, we believe that the account of interpolation and object formation proposed by Kellman and Shipley (1991), further developed in recent years (Kellman, 2003;…
Descriptors: Models, Reader Response, Perception, Identification
Kellman, Philip J.; Garrigan, Patrick; Shipley, Thomas F.; Yin, Carol; Machado, Liana – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005
Object perception requires interpolation processes that connect visible regions despite spatial gaps. Some research has suggested that interpolation may be a 3-D process, but objective performance data and evidence about the conditions leading to interpolation are needed. The authors developed an objective performance paradigm for testing 3-D…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Visual Perception, Spatial Ability, Computation
