Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Equated Scores | 3 |
Simulation | 3 |
Statistical Analysis | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Difficulty Level | 1 |
Educational Assessment | 1 |
English | 1 |
Error of Measurement | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Chen, Hanwei | 1 |
Cui, Zhongmin | 1 |
Fang, Yu | 1 |
Gallagher, Larry | 1 |
Holland, Paul | 1 |
McLaughlin, Don | 1 |
Sinharay, Sandip | 1 |
Stancavage, Fran | 1 |
Topczewski, Anna | 1 |
Woodruff, David | 1 |
Publication Type
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Topczewski, Anna; Cui, Zhongmin; Woodruff, David; Chen, Hanwei; Fang, Yu – ACT, Inc., 2013
This paper investigates four methods of linear equating under the common item nonequivalent groups design. Three of the methods are well known: Tucker, Angoff-Levine, and Congeneric-Levine. A fourth method is presented as a variant of the Congeneric-Levine method. Using simulation data generated from the three-parameter logistic IRT model we…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Equated Scores, Methods, Simulation
Sinharay, Sandip; Holland, Paul – ETS Research Report Series, 2006
It is a widely held belief that anchor tests should be miniature versions (i.e., minitests), with respect to content and statistical characteristics of the tests being equated. This paper examines the foundations for this belief. It examines the requirement of statistical representativeness of anchor tests that are content representative. The…
Descriptors: Test Items, Equated Scores, Evaluation Methods, Difficulty Level
McLaughlin, Don; Gallagher, Larry; Stancavage, Fran – American Institutes for Research, 2004
With the advent of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the context for NAEP participation is changing. Whereas in the past participation in NAEP has always been voluntary, participation is now mandatory for some grade and subjects among schools receiving Title I funds. While this will certainly raise school-level participation rates in the mandated…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, School Districts, Participation, Educational Assessment