Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 11 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 26 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 85 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Chang, Hua-Hua | 14 |
| Weiss, David J. | 10 |
| Stocking, Martha L. | 8 |
| Dodd, Barbara G. | 6 |
| Glas, Cees A. W. | 6 |
| Reckase, Mark D. | 6 |
| Zwick, Rebecca | 6 |
| van der Linden, Wim J. | 6 |
| Davey, Tim | 5 |
| Meijer, Rob R. | 5 |
| Reese, Lynda M. | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Middle Schools | 4 |
| Elementary Education | 3 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Grade 5 | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Grade 9 | 2 |
| Junior High Schools | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Researchers | 2 |
Location
| Canada | 2 |
| Denmark | 2 |
| Netherlands | 2 |
| Taiwan | 2 |
| Argentina | 1 |
| Canada (Montreal) | 1 |
| Germany | 1 |
| Indonesia | 1 |
| Philippines | 1 |
| Poland | 1 |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedNicewander, W. Alan; Thomasson, Gary L. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1999
Derives three reliability estimates for the Bayes modal estimate (BME) and the maximum-likelihood estimate (MLE) of theta in computerized adaptive tests (CATs). Computes the three reliability estimates and the true reliabilities of both BME and MLE for seven simulated CATs. Results show the true reliabilities for BME and MLE to be nearly identical…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Computer Assisted Testing
Gershon, Richard; Bergstrom, Betty – 1995
When examinees are allowed to review responses on an adaptive test, can they "cheat" the adaptive algorithm in order to take an easier test and improve their performance? Theoretically, deliberately answering items incorrectly will lower the examinee ability estimate and easy test items will be administered. If review is then allowed,…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing
Stocking, Martha L. – 1988
Recent advances in psychometrics and computer technology encourage the development of model-based methods of individualized testing on a microcomputer, where each examinee receives short tests and where the number of pretest items that can be administered is severely restricted. On-line (i.e., data is collected on operational equipment) methods…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks, Item Response Theory
Davey, Tim; Parshall, Cynthia G. – 1995
Although computerized adaptive tests acquire their efficiency by successively selecting items that provide optimal measurement at each examinee's estimated level of ability, operational testing programs will typically consider additional factors in item selection. In practice, items are generally selected with regard to at least three, often…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing
Yi, Qing; Nering, Michael L. – 1998
This study developed a model to simulate nonmodel-fitting responses in a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) environment, and to examine the effectiveness of the model. The underlying idea was to simulate examinees' test behaviors realistically. This study simulated a situation in which examinees are exposed to or are coached on test items before…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Goodness of Fit, Item Response Theory
Patsula, Liane N.; Steffen, Mandred – 1997
One challenge associated with computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is the maintenance of test and item security while allowing for daily testing. An alternative to continually creating new pools containing an independent set of items would be to consider each CAT pool as a sample of items from a larger collection (referred to as a VAT) rather than…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks, Multiple Choice Tests
Blais, Jean-Guy; Raiche, Gilles – 2002
This paper examines some characteristics of the statistics associated with the sampling distribution of the proficiency level estimate when the Rasch model is used. These characteristics allow the judgment of the meaning to be given to the proficiency level estimate obtained in adaptive testing, and as a consequence, they can illustrate the…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics)
Peer reviewedChen, Ssu-Kuang; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1997
A simulation study explored the effect of population distribution on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and expected a posteriori (EAP) estimation in computerized adaptive testing based on the rating scale model of D. Andrich (1978). The choice between EAP and MLE for particular situations is discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Estimation (Mathematics)
Peer reviewedKoch, William R.; Dodd, Barbara G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
Basic procedures for performing computerized adaptive testing based on the successive intervals (SI) Rasch model were evaluated. The SI model was applied to simulated and real attitude data sets. Item pools as small as 30 items performed well, and the model appeared practical for Likert-type data. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewedWise, Steven L.; Finney, Sara J.; Enders, Craig K.; Freeman, Sharon A.; Severance, Donald D. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1999
Examined whether providing item review on a computerized adaptive test could be used by examinees to inflate their scores. Two studies involving 139 undergraduates suggest that examinees are not highly proficient at discriminating item difficulty. A simulation study showed the usefulness of a strategy identified by G. Kingsbury (1996) as a way to…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Higher Education
Xu, Xueli; Douglas, Jeff – Psychometrika, 2006
Nonparametric item response models have been developed as alternatives to the relatively inflexible parametric item response models. An open question is whether it is possible and practical to administer computerized adaptive testing with nonparametric models. This paper explores the possibility of computerized adaptive testing when using…
Descriptors: Simulation, Nonparametric Statistics, Item Analysis, Item Response Theory
Yan, Duanli; Lewis, Charles; Stocking, Martha – 1998
It is unrealistic to suppose that standard item response theory (IRT) models will be appropriate for all new and currently considered computer-based tests. In addition to developing new models, researchers will need to give some attention to the possibility of constructing and analyzing new tests without the aid of strong models. Computerized…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Response Theory
Meijer, Rob R.; van Krimpen-Stoop, Edith M. L. A. – 1998
Several person-fit statistics have been proposed to detect item score patterns that do not fit an item response theory model. To classify response patterns as not fitting a model, a distribution of a person-fit statistic is needed. The null distributions of several fit statistics have been investigated using conventionally administered tests, but…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Foreign Countries, Item Response Theory
Capar, Nilufer K.; Thompson, Tony; Davey, Tim – 2000
Information provided for computerized adaptive test (CAT) simulees was compared under two conditions on two moderately correlated trait composites, mathematics and reading comprehension. The first condition used information provided by in-scale items alone, while the second condition used information provided by in- and out-of-scale items together…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Response Theory
Nandakumar, Ratna; Roussos, Louis – 2001
Computerized adaptive tests (CATs) pose major obstacles to the traditional assessment of differential item functioning (DIF). This paper proposes a modification of the SIBTEST DIF procedure for CATs, called CATSIB. CATSIB matches test takers on estimated ability based on unidimensional item response theory. To control for impact-induced Type I…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Identification

Direct link
