Publication Date
| In 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2024 | 2 |
Descriptor
| Manipulative Materials | 2 |
| Object Manipulation | 2 |
| Skill Development | 2 |
| Spatial Ability | 2 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Experiential Learning | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Gender Differences | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Hands on Science | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Alvin G. Bansil | 1 |
| Elizabeth A. Gunderson | 1 |
| Erna V. Yabut | 1 |
| Grace Bennett-Pierre | 1 |
| Nora S. Newcombe | 1 |
| Thomas F. Shipley | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Philippines (Manila) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textAlvin G. Bansil; Erna V. Yabut – Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2025
Physical manipulatives enhanced knowledge acquisition by engaging learners in hands-on experiences that supported spatial reasoning. These tools allowed learners to see, touch, and manipulate objects, improving their ability to mentally rotate and visualize structures. This study challenged the assumption that most learners are purely visual by…
Descriptors: Grade 7, Skill Development, Spatial Ability, Abstract Reasoning
Direct linkGrace Bennett-Pierre; Thomas F. Shipley; Nora S. Newcombe; Elizabeth A. Gunderson – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2025
Non-rigid spatial thinking, or mental transformations where the distance between two points in an object changes (e.g., folding, breaking, bending), is required for many STEM fields but remains critically understudied. We developed and tested a non-rigid, ductile spatial skill measure based on reasoning about knots with 279 US adults (M = 30.90,…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Spatial Ability, Gender Differences, Object Manipulation
