NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 20013
Lau v Nichols1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 171 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baldwin, Peter – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2021
In the Bookmark standard-setting procedure, panelists are instructed to consider what examinees know rather than what they might attain by guessing; however, because examinees sometimes do guess, the procedure includes a correction for guessing. Like other corrections for guessing, the Bookmark's correction assumes that examinees either know the…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leventhal, Brian C.; Grabovsky, Irina – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
Standard setting is arguably one of the most subjective techniques in test development and psychometrics. The decisions when scores are compared to standards, however, are arguably the most consequential outcomes of testing. Providing licensure to practice in a profession has high stake consequences for the public. Denying graduation or forcing…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Weighted Scores, Test Construction, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Papageorgiou, Spiros; Tannenbaum, Richard J. – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2016
Although there has been substantial work on argument-based approaches to validation as well as standard-setting methodologies, it might not always be clear how standard setting fits into argument-based validity. The purpose of this article is to address this lack in the literature, with a specific focus on topics related to argument-based…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Language Tests, Test Validity, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Benton, Tom; Elliott, Gill – Research Papers in Education, 2016
In recent years the use of expert judgement to set and maintain examination standards has been increasingly criticised in favour of approaches based on statistical modelling. This paper reviews existing research on this controversy and attempts to unify the evidence within a framework where expertise is utilised in the form of comparative…
Descriptors: Reliability, Expertise, Mathematical Models, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Popham, W. James – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The author recalls that as a child, he grooved on teeter-totters. Also known as a seesaw, a teeter-totter is a long, narrow board that's elevated with a pivot point in the middle so that as one end goes down the other end goes up. When going up or going down, sometimes quite rapidly, teeter-totters can provide their two riders with some…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Performance, Standards
Nebraska Department of Education, 2018
The 2018 Nebraska Student-Centered Assessment System (NSCAS) Summative technical report documents the processes and procedures implemented to support the Spring 2018 NSCAS Summative English Language Arts (ELA), Mathematics, and Science assessments by NWEA under the supervision of the Nebraska Department of Education (NDE). The technical report…
Descriptors: Summative Evaluation, Language Tests, English, Mathematics Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kane, Michael T.; Tannenbaum, Richard J. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The authors observe in this commentary that construct maps can help standard-setting panels to make realistic and internally consistent recommendations for performance-level descriptions (PLDs) and cut-scores, but the benefits may not be realized if policymakers do not fully understand the rationale for the recommendations provided by the…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Cutting Scores, Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bunch, Michael B. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
In this issue of "Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives," Adam E. Wyse provides a thorough review of research to date on the use of construct maps in standard setting. He juxtaposes concepts and methods in ways that make their connections to one another clearer and more obvious than they might otherwise have been. In…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Validity, Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Davis-Becker, Susan – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
In his article "Construct Maps for Standard Setting," Adam E. Wyse provides a detailed review on the current use of construct maps in standard setting, including how they may be operationalized within a variety of standard-setting methods. The premise of the argument is that construct maps can serve as a useful tool for conducting a…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Sample Size, Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McClarty, Katie Larsen – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The construct map is a promising tool for organizing the data standard-setting panelists interpret. The challenge in applying construct maps to standard-setting procedures will be the judicious selection of data to include within this organizing framework. Therefore, this commentary focuses on decisions about what to include in the construct map.…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Validity, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schulz, E. Matthew – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
In this article, E. Matthew Schulz responds to Adam Wyse's article, "Construct Maps as a Foundation for Standard Setting." In doing so, he asserts that one of the most important ideas in Wyse's work is that information used in standard setting needs to be better represented through the use of graphics. However, he's not…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Item Response Theory, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Skaggs, Gary – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The construct map is a particularly good way to approach instrument development, and this author states that he was delighted to read Adam Wyse's thoughts about how to use construct maps for standard setting. For a number of popular standard-setting methods, Wyse shows how typical feedback to panelists fits within a construct map framework.…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Test Construction, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kingston, Neal M.; Tiemann, Gail C.; Loughran, Jessica T. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The authors of this article comment on "Construct Maps as a Foundation for Standard Setting," by Adam E. Wyse (this issue) in which Wyse presents construct maps, a visual display of a variety of sources of evidence that support standard-setting decisions, and shows how this approach could be used with a variety of existing…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Methods, Misconceptions
Northwest Evaluation Association, 2015
Recently, the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (Smarter Balanced) released a document that established initial performance levels and the associated threshold scale scores for the Smarter Balanced assessment. The report included estimated percentages of students expected to perform at each of the four performance levels, reported by grade…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Standard Setting (Scoring), Pretesting, Cutting Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hsieh, Mingchuan – Language Testing, 2013
When implementing standard setting procedures, there are two major concerns: variance between panelists and efficiency in conducting multiple rounds of judgments. With regard to the former, there is concern over the consistency of the cutoff scores made by different panelists. If the cut scores show an inordinately wide range then further rounds…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Standard Setting (Scoring), Language Tests, English (Second Language)
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12