NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 211 results Save | Export
Yun-Kyung Kim; Li Cai – National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2025
This paper introduces an application of cross-classified item response theory (IRT) modeling to an assessment utilizing the embedded standard setting (ESS) method (Lewis & Cook). The cross-classified IRT model is used to treat both item and person effects as random, where the item effects are regressed on the target performance levels (target…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Item Response Theory, Test Items, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lewis, Jennifer; Lim, Hwanggyu; Padellaro, Frank; Sireci, Stephen G.; Zenisky, April L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022
Setting cut scores on (MSTs) is difficult, particularly when the test spans several grade levels, and the selection of items from MST panels must reflect the operational test specifications. In this study, we describe, illustrate, and evaluate three methods for mapping panelists' Angoff ratings into cut scores on the scale underlying an MST. The…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baldwin, Peter; Margolis, Melissa J.; Clauser, Brian E.; Mee, Janet; Winward, Marcia – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
Evidence of the internal consistency of standard-setting judgments is a critical part of the validity argument for tests used to make classification decisions. The bookmark standard-setting procedure is a popular approach to establishing performance standards, but there is relatively little research that reflects on the internal consistency of the…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Probability, Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
One commonly used compromise standard-setting method is the Beuk (1984) method. A key assumption of the Beuk method is that the emphasis given to the pass rate and the percent correct ratings should be proportional to the extent that the panelists agree on their ratings. However, whether the slope of Beuk line reflects the emphasis that panelists…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Weighted Scores, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2020
This article compares cut scores from two variations of the Hofstee and Beuk methods, which determine cut scores by resolving inconsistencies in panelists' judgments about cut scores and pass rates, with the Angoff method. The first variation uses responses to the Hofstee and Beuk percentage correct and pass rate questions to calculate cut scores.…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting (Scoring), Equations (Mathematics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Skaggs, Gary; Hein, Serge F.; Wilkins, Jesse L. M. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
In test-centered standard-setting methods, borderline performance can be represented by many different profiles of strengths and weaknesses. As a result, asking panelists to estimate item or test performance for a hypothetical group study of borderline examinees, or a typical borderline examinee, may be an extremely difficult task and one that can…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Testing Problems, Profiles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicolas Rochat; Laurent Lima; Pascal Bressoux – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2025
Inference is considered an important factor in comprehension models and has been described as a causal factor in predicting comprehension. To date, specific tests for inference are rare and often rely on specific thematic texts. This reliance on thematic inference may raise some concerns as inference is related to prior text-specific knowledge.…
Descriptors: Inferences, Reading Comprehension, Reading Tests, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
David Loy; Rhonda Nelson; Jared Allsop; Carol Johnston – Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 2024
Accreditation is a critical process in maintaining standards of consistency and excellence in the academic preparation of students for their chosen profession. While academic programs, professional associations, and credentialing organizations all recognize the importance of programmatic accreditation in recreational therapy professional…
Descriptors: Therapeutic Recreation, Accreditation (Institutions), Scores, Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Russell, Michael; Moncaleano, Sebastian – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2020
Although both content alignment and standard-setting procedures rely on content-expert panel judgements, only the latter employs discussion among panel members. This study employed a modified form of the Webb methodology to examine content alignment for twelve tests administered as part of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS).…
Descriptors: Test Content, Test Items, Discussion, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Papageorgiou, Spiros; Davis, Larry; Ohta, Renka; Gomez, Pablo Garcia – ETS Research Report Series, 2022
In this research report, we describe a study to map the scores of the "TOEFL® Essentials"™ test to the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB). The TOEFL Essentials test is a four-skills assessment of foundational English language skills and communication abilities in academic and general (daily life) contexts. At the time of writing this…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Language Tests, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E.; Babcock, Ben – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
A common belief is that the Bookmark method is a cognitively simpler standard-setting method than the modified Angoff method. However, a limited amount of research has investigated panelist's ability to perform well the Bookmark method, and whether some of the challenges panelists face with the Angoff method may also be present in the Bookmark…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Evaluation Methods, Testing Problems, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Moloi, Qetelo; Kanjee, Anil – South African Journal of Education, 2021
The study reported on here contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the use of standard setting methods for improving the reporting and utility value of assessment results in South Africa as well as for addressing the conceptual shortcomings of the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) reporting framework. Using data from the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Standard Setting (Scoring), Student Evaluation, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Cuhadar, Ismail; Gelbal, Selahattin – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2021
The institutions in education use various assessment methods to decide on the proficiency levels of students in a particular construct. This study investigated whether the decisions differed based on the type of assessment: norm-and criterion-referenced assessment. An achievement test with 20 multiple-choice items was administered to 107 students…
Descriptors: Norm Referenced Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Decision Making, Achievement Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2018
A key part of determining cut-scores when performing Angoff standard setting is utilizing equating methods to place standard-setting ratings onto the scale used to report scores to examinees. This article describes three equating methods that can be employed to place Angoff ratings onto the scale used to report scores to examinees when applying…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Equated Scores, Probability, Regression (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Kara, Hakan; Cetin, Sevda – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2020
In this study, the efficiency of various random sampling methods to reduce the number of items rated by judges in an Angoff standard-setting study was examined and the methods were compared with each other. Firstly, the full-length test was formed by combining Placement Test 2012 and 2013 mathematics subsets. After then, simple random sampling…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Sampling, Error of Measurement
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  15