Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Standard Setting (Scoring) | 3 |
Ability | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Difficulty Level | 1 |
Examiners | 1 |
Feasibility Studies | 1 |
Feedback | 1 |
Foreign Countries | 1 |
Grading | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment & Evaluation in… | 3 |
Author
Darling, Jonathan | 1 |
Homer, Matt | 1 |
Jones, Philip | 1 |
Merry, Stephen | 1 |
Orsmond, Paul | 1 |
Pell, Godfrey | 1 |
Poole, Phillippa | 1 |
Reiling, Kevin | 1 |
Shulruf, Boaz | 1 |
Wilkinson, Tim | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Shulruf, Boaz; Poole, Phillippa; Jones, Philip; Wilkinson, Tim – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015
A new probability-based standard setting technique, the Objective Borderline Method (OBM), was introduced recently. This was based on a mathematical model of how test scores relate to student ability. The present study refined the model and tested it using 2500 simulated data-sets. The OBM was feasible to use. On average, the OBM performed well…
Descriptors: Probability, Methods, Standard Setting (Scoring), Scores
Homer, Matt; Darling, Jonathan; Pell, Godfrey – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
Over recent years, UK medical schools have moved to more integrated summative examinations. This paper analyses data from the written assessment of undergraduate medical students to investigate two key psychometric aspects of this type of high-stakes assessment. Firstly, the strength of the relationship between examiner predictions of item…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Medical Schools, Summative Evaluation, High Stakes Tests

Orsmond, Paul; Merry, Stephen; Reiling, Kevin – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2002
Examined a method of student self- and peer assessment involving student construction of grading criteria using exemplars. Found that the use of exemplars can help students demonstrate greater understanding of both grading criteria and subject standards, and that the use of exemplars forms a focus for meaningful formative feedback. (EV)
Descriptors: College Students, Feedback, Grading, Higher Education