NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 90 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dimitrov, Dimiter M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Proposed is a new method of standard setting referred to as response vector for mastery (RVM) method. Under the RVM method, the task of panelists that participate in the standard setting process does not involve conceptualization of a borderline examinee and probability judgments as it is the case with the Angoff and bookmark methods. Also, the…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Computation, Mastery Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lewis, Jennifer; Lim, Hwanggyu; Padellaro, Frank; Sireci, Stephen G.; Zenisky, April L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022
Setting cut scores on (MSTs) is difficult, particularly when the test spans several grade levels, and the selection of items from MST panels must reflect the operational test specifications. In this study, we describe, illustrate, and evaluate three methods for mapping panelists' Angoff ratings into cut scores on the scale underlying an MST. The…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baldwin, Peter – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2021
In the Bookmark standard-setting procedure, panelists are instructed to consider what examinees know rather than what they might attain by guessing; however, because examinees sometimes do guess, the procedure includes a correction for guessing. Like other corrections for guessing, the Bookmark's correction assumes that examinees either know the…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baldwin, Peter; Margolis, Melissa J.; Clauser, Brian E.; Mee, Janet; Winward, Marcia – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
Evidence of the internal consistency of standard-setting judgments is a critical part of the validity argument for tests used to make classification decisions. The bookmark standard-setting procedure is a popular approach to establishing performance standards, but there is relatively little research that reflects on the internal consistency of the…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Probability, Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
One commonly used compromise standard-setting method is the Beuk (1984) method. A key assumption of the Beuk method is that the emphasis given to the pass rate and the percent correct ratings should be proportional to the extent that the panelists agree on their ratings. However, whether the slope of Beuk line reflects the emphasis that panelists…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Weighted Scores, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2020
This article compares cut scores from two variations of the Hofstee and Beuk methods, which determine cut scores by resolving inconsistencies in panelists' judgments about cut scores and pass rates, with the Angoff method. The first variation uses responses to the Hofstee and Beuk percentage correct and pass rate questions to calculate cut scores.…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting (Scoring), Equations (Mathematics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E.; Babcock, Ben – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
A common belief is that the Bookmark method is a cognitively simpler standard-setting method than the modified Angoff method. However, a limited amount of research has investigated panelist's ability to perform well the Bookmark method, and whether some of the challenges panelists face with the Angoff method may also be present in the Bookmark…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Evaluation Methods, Testing Problems, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Moloi, Qetelo; Kanjee, Anil – South African Journal of Education, 2021
The study reported on here contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the use of standard setting methods for improving the reporting and utility value of assessment results in South Africa as well as for addressing the conceptual shortcomings of the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) reporting framework. Using data from the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Standard Setting (Scoring), Student Evaluation, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E.; Babcock, Ben – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2017
This article provides an overview of the Hofstee standard-setting method and illustrates several situations where the Hofstee method will produce undefined cut scores. The situations where the cut scores will be undefined involve cases where the line segment derived from the Hofstee ratings does not intersect the score distribution curve based on…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting (Scoring), Comparative Analysis
Sinclair, Andrea L., Ed.; Thacker, Arthur, Ed. – Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO), 2019
California's Commission on Teacher Credentialing (Commission) requires all programs of preliminary multiple and single subject teacher preparation to use a Commission-approved Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA) as one of the program completion requirements for prospective teacher candidates. Three TPA models were approved by the Commission: (1)…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Performance Based Assessment, Models, Credentials
Winter, Phoebe C.; Hansen, Mark; McCoy, Michelle – National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2019
In order to accurately assess the English language proficiency of special populations of English learners, student assessment programs must maintain the comparability of standard and modified assessment formats, allowing for equivalent inferences to be made across student classifications. However, given the typically small size of special…
Descriptors: English Language Learners, Language Proficiency, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hurtado, Sylvia; Pryor, John H. – College and University, 2011
The primary users of the current college ranking systems do not seem to be high-school students and families, but college presidents, board members, and development officers. As structured, the commercial ranking systems imply a precision that is not corroborated by research on what matters in college, nor can college quality be accurately summed…
Descriptors: College Choice, Educational Quality, Program Effectiveness, School Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Secolsky, Charles – Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 2009
This article describes four measurement tools that are of potential value for institutional researchers as greater demands are being placed upon their work. The author describes scale development, select methods for setting passing scores, validating passing scores and the topic of equating--both equipercentile and linear. Not only should…
Descriptors: Institutional Research, Community Colleges, Researchers, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bennett, John; Tognolini, Jim; Pickering, Samantha – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2012
This paper describes how a state education system in Australia introduced standards-referenced assessments into its large-scale, high-stakes, curriculum-based examinations in a way that enables comparison of performance across time even though the examinations are different each year. It describes the multi-stage modified Angoff standard-setting…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Tests, Foreign Countries, Cutting Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fowell, S. L.; Fewtrell, R.; McLaughlin, P. J. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2008
Absolute standard setting procedures are recommended for assessment in medical education. Absolute, test-centred standard setting procedures were introduced for written assessments in the Liverpool MBChB in 2001. The modified Angoff and Ebel methods have been used for short answer question-based and extended matching question-based papers,…
Descriptors: Medical Education, Standard Setting (Scoring), Judges, Interrater Reliability
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6