NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 106 to 120 of 502 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alonzo, Alicia C. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2010
In their article "Innovations in Setting Performance Standards for K-12 Test-Based Accountability," Kristen Huff and Barbara S. Plake (2010) lay out three preconditions for continued investment in standard-setting methodology and practice, all focused on the sound development and use of achievement level descriptors (ALDs). Among these…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Achievement, Elementary Secondary Education, Accountability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hurtz, Gregory M.; Jones, J. Patrick – Applied Measurement in Education, 2009
Standard setting methods such as the Angoff method rely on judgments of item characteristics; item response theory empirically estimates item characteristics and displays them in item characteristic curves (ICCs). This study evaluated several indexes of rater fit to ICCs as a method for judging rater accuracy in their estimates of expected item…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Item Response Theory, Reliability, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyse, Adam E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
Standard setting is a method used to set cut scores on large-scale assessments. One of the most popular standard setting methods is the Bookmark method. In the Bookmark method, panelists are asked to envision a response probability (RP) criterion and move through a booklet of ordered items based on a RP criterion. This study investigates whether…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dochy, Filip; Kyndt, Eva; Baeten, Marlies; Pottier, Sofie; Veestraeten, Marlies; Leuven, K. U. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2009
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of different standard setting methods on the size and composition of the borderline group, on the discrimination between different types of students and on the types of students passing with one method but failing with another. A total of 107 university students were classified into 4 different types…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), College Students, Higher Education, Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Van Nijlen, Daniel; Janssen, Rianne – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2008
Essential for the validity of the judgments in a standard-setting study is that they follow the implicit task assumptions. In the Angoff method, judgments are assumed to be inversely related to the difficulty of the items; contrasting-groups judgments are assumed to be positively related to the ability of the students. In the present study,…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Validity, Regression (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huff, Kristen; Plake, Barbara S. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2010
Standard setting is a systematic process that uses a combination of judgmental and empirical procedures to make recommendations about where on the score continuum "cut scores" should be placed. Cut scores divide the score scale into categories consistent with the descriptions of student performance associated with multiple levels of achievement.…
Descriptors: Accountability, Educational Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hurtado, Sylvia; Pryor, John H. – College and University, 2011
The primary users of the current college ranking systems do not seem to be high-school students and families, but college presidents, board members, and development officers. As structured, the commercial ranking systems imply a precision that is not corroborated by research on what matters in college, nor can college quality be accurately summed…
Descriptors: College Choice, Educational Quality, Program Effectiveness, School Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stone, Gregory Ethan; Koskey, Kristin L. K.; Sondergeld, Toni A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
Typical validation studies on standard setting models, most notably the Angoff and modified Angoff models, have ignored construct development, a critical aspect associated with all conceptualizations of measurement processes. Stone compared the Angoff and objective standard setting (OSS) models and found that Angoff failed to define a legitimate…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Models, Construct Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyatt-Smith, Claire; Klenowski, Val; Gunn, Stephanie – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2010
There is a strong quest in several countries including Australia for greater national consistency in education and intensifying interest in standards for reporting. Given this, it is important to make explicit the intended and unintended consequences of assessment reform strategies and the pressures to pervert and conform. In a policy context that…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Student Evaluation, Teacher Attitudes, Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Secolsky, Charles – Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 2009
This article describes four measurement tools that are of potential value for institutional researchers as greater demands are being placed upon their work. The author describes scale development, select methods for setting passing scores, validating passing scores and the topic of equating--both equipercentile and linear. Not only should…
Descriptors: Institutional Research, Community Colleges, Researchers, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gotham, Katherine; Pickles, Andrew; Lord, Catherine – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2009
The aim of this study is to standardize Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) scores within a large sample to approximate an autism severity metric. Using a dataset of 1,415 individuals aged 2-16 years with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or nonspectrum diagnoses, a subset of 1,807 assessments from 1,118 individuals with ASD were divided…
Descriptors: Autism, Severity (of Disability), Scores, Pervasive Developmental Disorders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bennett, John; Tognolini, Jim; Pickering, Samantha – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2012
This paper describes how a state education system in Australia introduced standards-referenced assessments into its large-scale, high-stakes, curriculum-based examinations in a way that enables comparison of performance across time even though the examinations are different each year. It describes the multi-stage modified Angoff standard-setting…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Tests, Foreign Countries, Cutting Scores
Morgan, Deanna L. – National Center for Postsecondary Research, 2010
Cut scores are used in a variety of circumstances to aid in decision making through the establishment of a clear cut line between adjacent categories. Community colleges regularly use cut scores on placement tests to decide the appropriate course for each beginning student: the first college-level course or a developmental course, depending on…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Psychometrics, Best Practices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wheadon, Christopher; Beguin, Anton – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2010
Tiering is a multi-stage test design whereby teachers allocate students to a particular difficulty level (tier) of a test. This approach to the challenge of delivering assessments to students with a heterogeneous ability distribution is normal practice in UK public examinations at the age of 16. This study uses Item Response Theory number-correct…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Item Response Theory, Achievement Tests, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clauser, Brian E.; Harik, Polina; Margolis, Melissa J.; McManus, I. C.; Mollon, Jennifer; Chis, Liliana; Williams, Simon – Applied Measurement in Education, 2009
Numerous studies have compared the Angoff standard-setting procedure to other standard-setting methods, but relatively few studies have evaluated the procedure based on internal criteria. This study uses a generalizability theory framework to evaluate the stability of the estimated cut score. To provide a measure of internal consistency, this…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Group Discussion, Standard Setting (Scoring), Scoring
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  ...  |  34