Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Standardized Tests | 2 |
| Test Norms | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Alphabets | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Expressive Language | 1 |
| Intelligence Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Guides - General | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Florida | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
| Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textFoorman, Barbara R.; Petscher, Yaacov; Schatschneider, Chris – Florida Center for Reading Research, 2015
The FAIR-FS consists of computer-adaptive reading comprehension and oral language screening tasks that provide measures to track growth over time, as well as a Probability of Literacy Success (PLS) linked to grade-level performance (i.e., the 40th percentile) on the reading comprehension subtest of the Stanford Achievement Test (SAT-10) in the…
Descriptors: Reading Instruction, Screening Tests, Reading Comprehension, Oral Language
Peer reviewedWiig, Elisabeth H.; And Others – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1996
Computer-based and standardized administration of the Test of Word Knowledge were compared for 30 adolescent subjects with learning disabilities. The total, receptive, and expressive composites were higher for the standard administration. Results indicated the need for independent norms for computer-based adaptations of standardized language…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Expressive Language, Learning Disabilities, Norm Referenced Tests
