Descriptor
Judges | 3 |
Models | 3 |
Standards | 3 |
Debate | 2 |
Persuasive Discourse | 2 |
Academic Discourse | 1 |
Educational Assessment | 1 |
Educational Improvement | 1 |
Educational Objectives | 1 |
Evaluation | 1 |
Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Argumentation and Advocacy | 1 |
Publication Type
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Gass, Robert H., Jr. – Argumentation and Advocacy, 1988
Offers a critique of the narrative perspective as it relates to the National Debate Tournament (NDT) and suggests that an alternative "expert" model would better satisfy the goals of the activity while simultaneously remedying the primary shortcomings of NDT debate. (MS)
Descriptors: Academic Discourse, Debate, Evaluation, Higher Education
Reckase, Mark D. – 1998
Standard setting is a fairly widespread activity in educational and psychological measurement, but there is no formal psychometric theory to guide the development of standard setting methodology. This paper presents a conceptual framework for such a psychometric theory and uses the conceptual framework to analyze a number of methods for setting…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Judges, Measurement Techniques
Phillips, Leslie; And Others – 1985
The purpose of the three papers that make up this document is to explore and redefine the role of debate judges. The first paper, by Leslie Phillips, begins with the assertion that the debate judge is first and foremost an educator, notes that judging is one of the forces that shape and direct competitive forensics, and goes on to consider…
Descriptors: Debate, Educational Improvement, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria