NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Dowling-Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 2002
Analyzes recent U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in "Zelman v. Simmons-Harris," upholding the constitutionality of Cleveland's voucher program that provided public funds to private religious schools. Majority held that voucher program did not violate the Establishment Clause of the 14th Amendment. (PKP)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Educational Vouchers, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts
Russo, Charles J.; Mawdsley, Ralph D. – School Business Affairs, 2002
Describes the facts and state and federal constitutional law related to "Zelman v. Simons-Harris," a Cleveland school-voucher case before the United States Supreme Court. Argues that the Court will likely uphold the constitutionality of the Cleveland voucher program, finding that it does not advance religion in violation of the First…
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Educational Vouchers, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
American Biology Teacher, 1982
Presented in its entirety is Judge Overton's decision in favor of the plaintiffs (including the National Association of Biology Teachers) who sued the Arkansas Board of Education, et al., on the grounds that the "Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act" was unconstitutional. (DC)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Creationism, Elementary School Science, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Science, 1982
Presented is the complete text of the judgment, injunction, and opinion of U.S. District Court Judge William R. Overton who enjoined the Arkansas Board of Education from implementing the "Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act" of the state legislature. (Author/DC)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Creationism, Elementary School Science, Elementary Secondary Education
Bjorklun, Eugene C. – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1994
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Equal Access Act (EAA) had precedence over the state constitution under the Supremacy Clause. Examines that decision and considers its implications for the implementation of the EAA as well as other issues in church-state separation in education. (53 footnotes) (MLF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Court Role, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts
Hunt, Thomas C. – Texas Tech Journal of Education, 1981
The cumulaltive impact of court decisions, on the church-related elementary and secondary schools, especially those under Catholic auspices, and on the relationship between religion and education in modern American life is considered. (JN)
Descriptors: Church Programs, Church Role, Court Litigation, Educational Vouchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Viteritti, Joseph P. – Education Next, 2002
Describes the facts and legal basis of federal court decisions in "Zelman v. Simmons-Harris," a case before the U.S. Supreme Court to determine if Cleveland's school voucher program violates the Establish Clause. Discusses the possible educational, legal, and political consequences of the Court's decision. (On June 27, 2002, the Supreme…
Descriptors: Blacks, Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation
Camp, William E., Ed.; Connelly, Mary Jane, Ed.; Lane, Kenneth E., Ed.; Mead, Julie F., Ed. – 2000
This handbook for elementary and secondary school principals contains several chapters on topics important to building level administrators. Each chapter summarizes relevant state and federal court decisions and statutes, concluding with recommendations for practice. The handbook is divided into four sections: students and the law, special…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Child Abuse, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation