Descriptor
| Achievement Tests | 2 |
| State Programs | 2 |
| Testing Programs | 2 |
| Standard Setting | 1 |
| Standardized Tests | 1 |
| Synthesis | 1 |
| Test Interpretation | 1 |
| Test Use | 1 |
| Test Validity | 1 |
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 1 |
Author
| Green, Donald Ross | 2 |
| Lewis, Daniel M. | 1 |
| Trimble, C. Scott | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Kentucky | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGreen, Donald Ross; Trimble, C. Scott; Lewis, Daniel M. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2003
Describes the procedures by which Kentucky's state assessment program synthesized results from three standard setting procedures (Contrasting Groups, Bookmark, and Jaeger-Mills) for the 2000 state assessment. Shows the value of using multiple standard-setting approaches to gather information from each. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Standard Setting, State Programs, Synthesis
Download full textGreen, Donald Ross – 1997
It is argued that publishers of achievement tests, especially those who publish tests intended for use in many parts of the United States, are for the most part not in a position to obtain any decent evidence about the consequences of the uses that are made of their tests. What responsibilities and actions publishers can reasonably be expected to…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Standardized Tests, State Programs, Test Use
