Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 11 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 11 |
High Schools | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Policymakers | 4 |
Administrators | 1 |
Location
Pennsylvania | 7 |
California | 2 |
Maryland | 2 |
Washington | 2 |
Florida | 1 |
Hawaii | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
New Jersey | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Texas | 1 |
United States | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 27 |
Every Student Succeeds Act… | 3 |
Abbott v Burke | 1 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Aneesha Badrinarayan – Learning Policy Institute, 2024
The decisions states make regarding what their assessments look like and what kind of information they produce inevitably shape instruction. Since the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 ushered in an era of testing-based accountability for schools, state assessments have been governed by a set of design decisions that emphasize easily generated,…
Descriptors: Institutional Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Educational Assessment, State School District Relationship
Tamikia S. Greene – ProQuest LLC, 2021
Within the United States of America, a few states enacted a new educational accountability system that grades school districts and campuses that is measured by student performance. The state of Texas implemented the A-F accountability grading systems to inform the community and parents about the campuses in a simplistic layout and language. These…
Descriptors: Elementary School Teachers, Teacher Attitudes, Accountability, School Districts
James G. Cibulka; Martin E. Orland; Kenneth K. Wong – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2020
The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 (ESSA) grants states unprecedented discretion in implementing many of the federal law's requirements concerning the needs of the nation's educationally disadvantaged students. This theoretical paper addresses a void in the policy implementation literature on why ESEA reform efforts have not been more…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Educationally Disadvantaged
Alliance for Excellent Education, 2016
Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015, states and districts are responsible for supporting and improving the quality of low-performing high schools. This brief primer describes how ESSA impacts high school graduation rate goals, low-graduation-rate high schools, funding for high schools, school improvement funding, the High School…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, High Schools
Manwaring, Robert – Education Sector, 2010
In 1997, the state of California labeled Markham Middle School as low-performing. Located in the Watts neighborhood of Southeastern Los Angeles, Markham is stuffed with over 1,500 students in just three grades, sixth-eighth. Roughly 70 percent of the students are Hispanic, and 30 percent are black. Eighty-two percent are poor. That year, the…
Descriptors: School Restructuring, Disadvantaged Schools, Intervention, Educational Improvement
Chubb, John E. – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2012
Online learning and our current system of local education governance are at odds with one another, to say the least. In this paper, John Chubb examines how local school district control retards the widespread use of instructional technologies. He argues that the surest way to break down the system's inherent resistance to technology is to shift…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Web Based Instruction, Blended Learning, Virtual Classrooms
Scott, Caitlin – Center on Education Policy, 2009
This report describes how California is providing direct intervention to improve structures and processes in districts, which is intended over time to improve curriculum, instruction, and student achievement at the school level. For districts subject to federal Corrective Action under NCLB, California's approach is "top down" in that…
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Compliance (Legal), Case Studies, Technical Assistance
Ahearn, Eileen – Project Forum, 2007
Supplemental educational services (SES) is a component of the omnibus Elementary and Secondary Education Act usually referred to as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. The law authorizes many programs besides SES, most notably Title I grants targeted to meet the needs of children in high poverty schools. As defined in the non-regulatory…
Descriptors: Supplementary Education, Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Disabilities
Honawar, Vaishali – Education Week, 2006
The Maryland legislature's success in blocking a state takeover of low-performing schools in Baltimore under the No Child Left Behind Act raises the prospect of political resistance in other states that might attempt such intervention. While no other state has yet invoked the federal law to take control of a school, the experience in Maryland…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, State Legislation, Public Schools, Urban Schools
Bumsted, Brad – Education Next, 2005
On December 11, 2003, the Reading, Pennsylvania, School District, on behalf of "their students and their schools," filed a "Petition for Review" with the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. In filing this petition, Reading became the first school district in the nation to sue a state education department over the No Child Left…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Court Litigation, State School District Relationship, Financial Support
Steiner, Lucy M. – Learning Point Associates / North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), 2005
This paper is focused on the last of the fourth options in the "What Works When" series, a series designed to help district leaders understand what is known about when and under what circumstances each of the four options works to improve student learning. The goal of this series is to help district leaders determine which change is the…
Descriptors: State Government, Government School Relationship, State School District Relationship, School Administration

Brady, Ronald C. – State Education Standard, 2003
Reveals some of the lessons learned from state and local efforts to transform low-performing schools. Summarizes and analyzes the state and local intervention experience based on a review of efforts undertaken in 22 states since 1989. Classifies these interventions in terms of their intrusiveness: mild, moderate, and strong. (Contains 12…
Descriptors: Accountability, Disadvantaged Schools, Elementary Secondary Education, Intervention
Ireland, Lisa – Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, 2006
The consequences of not graduating from high school are increasingly serious for both individuals and society as a whole. As a result, state and federal accountability systems now require reporting of more detailed graduation and dropout data. The federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) requires states to report disaggregated…
Descriptors: High School Students, Graduation Rate, Dropout Rate, Pacific Islanders
Hammer, Patricia Cahape – AEL, 2005
Since 1988, more than half of all states have passed laws that allow state authorities to take control of local school districts under certain circumstances. As of 2004, 54 cases of state takeovers had been reported nationwide--most of them in urban and rural districts. The most commonly cited causes are financial and management problems; academic…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), School Districts, Urban Schools, Rural Schools
Sanders, Ted – American School Board Journal, 2003
Displays findings from a fall 2002 survey of all states to determine how they were progressing in meeting No Child Left Behind Act's list of requirements. Generally, states and local districts are stronger developing accountability systems but a significant gap remains between the federal law's demands and the capacity to meet them. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Accountability, Database Management Systems, Educational Improvement, Federal Legislation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2