Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 28 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Anderson, Leslie M. | 2 |
Olson, Lynn | 2 |
Scott, Caitlin | 2 |
Airola, Denise | 1 |
Bakia, Marianne | 1 |
Bernstein, Larry | 1 |
Bradley, Sean | 1 |
Brenner, Devon | 1 |
Burns, Courtney | 1 |
Byrd, Sandra | 1 |
Campano, Gerald | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Missouri | 5 |
Louisiana | 3 |
Delaware | 2 |
Georgia | 2 |
Indiana | 2 |
Massachusetts | 2 |
Virginia | 2 |
Alaska | 1 |
Arizona | 1 |
Arkansas | 1 |
California | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 36 |
Every Student Succeeds Act… | 4 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 3 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sykes, Gary; Martin, Kacy – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2019
This study examined a sample of plans that states submitted to the U.S. Education Department in 2015, pursuant to requirements in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I, Part A. Plans were aimed at redressing inequities in access to qualified teachers as this problem has emerged in states and districts across the country. A…
Descriptors: Equal Education, Teacher Distribution, Low Income Students, Educationally Disadvantaged
Pompa, Delia; Villegas, Leslie – Migration Policy Institute, 2017
The "Every Student Succeeds Act" (ESSA), signed into law in 2015 and still in the midst of implementation, requires states to develop and submit to the U.S. Department of Education a state education accountability plan. Compared to the previous federal education law, the "No Child Left Behind Act" (NCLB), ESSA mandates that…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, English Language Learners, Accountability
Mann, Ryan; Mays, Alex – Healthy Schools Campaign, 2017
Too many students spend their days in buildings with unhealthy air, have limited opportunities for physical activity, and have inadequate access to fresh water, nutritious food or a school nurse. The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) recognizes the need for schools to support the whole child and specifically acknowledges the importance of health…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Child Health
Brenner, Devon – Rural Educator, 2016
On December 10, 2015 President Obama signed the "Every Student Succeeds Act," Public Law 114-95, which will take effect in the fall of 2016 and which replaces No Child Left Behind (NCLB)--the name for the nation's suite of K-12 education laws in effect from 2001 to 2016. There are many similarities between NCLB and ESSA. For example,…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Rural Education
Cardichon, Jessica; Bradley, Sean – Alliance for Excellent Education, 2016
States are responsible for setting the minimum number of students needed to form a student subgroup for federal reporting and accountability purposes. This required student subgroup size is commonly referred to as the state-set "n-size." States should set this number as low as possible to maximize the number of student subgroups created.…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Accountability
Charles, Karen; Bernstein, Larry; Dempsey, Terri; Burns, Courtney; Parish, Elizabeth; Hudson, Jordan – Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education, 2012
In 2008, the U.S. Department of Education (the Department) launched a differentiated accountability pilot to allow states to distinguish between those schools identified for improvement in need of substantial help and those closer to meeting achievement goals. In July 2008 and January 2009, the Department approved waivers to give nine states the…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, State Standards, Statewide Planning, Accountability
US Department of Education, 2012
"The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965" (ESEA) has directed federal resources to schools for more than four decades to help ensure all children have equal access to a quality education. The most recent reauthorization--or congressional update to the law--occurred with the passage of the "No Child Left Behind Act of…
Descriptors: School Turnaround, Educational Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation
Imazeki, Jennifer; Goe, Laura – National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality, 2009
States have been working on strategies to address the equitable distribution of teachers for a number of years. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as reauthorized by the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, specifically calls for states to identify and address the inequitable distribution of highly qualified, experienced…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Teacher Distribution
Duffrin, Elizabeth; Scott, Caitlin; Kober, Nancy, Ed. – Center on Education Policy, 2008
When the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) went into effect in 2002, Georgia's statewide accountability system was already well underway. As a result, some schools faced the federal law's most serious consequences as early as 2004. That left Georgia policymakers with a dilemma on which there remains little federal guidance: what to do with…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, School Restructuring, Intervention, Federal Legislation
Chubb, John E. – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2012
Online learning and our current system of local education governance are at odds with one another, to say the least. In this paper, John Chubb examines how local school district control retards the widespread use of instructional technologies. He argues that the surest way to break down the system's inherent resistance to technology is to shift…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Web Based Instruction, Blended Learning, Virtual Classrooms
Scott, Caitlin – Center on Education Policy, 2009
This report describes how California is providing direct intervention to improve structures and processes in districts, which is intended over time to improve curriculum, instruction, and student achievement at the school level. For districts subject to federal Corrective Action under NCLB, California's approach is "top down" in that…
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Compliance (Legal), Case Studies, Technical Assistance
Manna, Paul – Educational Policy, 2006
This article examines early implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act's (NCLB) accountability provisions. Theoretically, the author explains how executing education policy in the United States requires federal officials to employ tactics designed to assert control over state implementers while persuading them to adopt federal priorities as…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Accountability, Federal Programs, Educational Policy
Vergari, Sandra – American Journal of Education, 2007
Under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, school districts that receive federal Title 1 education funds and have a "school in need of improvement--year two" must implement supplemental educational services (SES). Such districts must allocate a portion of their Title 1 funds to free tutoring for low-income students. Providers may be…
Descriptors: Federalism, Federal Legislation, Federal Government, Educational Change

Ritter, Gary W.; Lucas, Christopher J. – Education Next, 2003
Reports on the results of qualitative research to determine the current status of states' efforts to implement the No Child Left Behind Act. Conducted open-ended, structured interviews with key policy makers in three high-readiness states (Florida, New York, Texas), two mid-readiness states (California and South Carolina), and three…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Federal State Relationship, Field Interviews, Statewide Planning
Duckenfield, Marty, Ed. – National Dropout Prevention Center/Network (NDPC/N), 2007
The "National Dropout Prevention Newsletter" is published quarterly by the National Dropout Prevention Center/Network. This issue contains the following articles: (1) Policy Matters; (2) A Conversation With A State Policymaker (Stephen Canessa); (3) Policy Matters at the School Level (Steven W. Edwards); (4) EEDA: Promise or Peril? (Sam…
Descriptors: Dropouts, Dropout Prevention, Statewide Planning, Newsletters