This chapter presents the state of Wisconsin and the University of Wisconsin System as an ongoing case study for best practices in systematic, intentional, statewide programming and initiatives connecting undergraduate research and economic development.

Connecticut's higher education accountability focuses on using measures of employment readiness and success, including employer satisfaction surveys.

Changes in the balance of power over higher education require increased leadership by state coordinating boards and their directors. (Editor)

This article examines why state planning and policy for higher education are increasingly focused on increasing educational attainment, quality, and the productivity of the system. It presents four "stories" which illustrate initiatives to improve attainment, quality, and productivity, but fall far short of exhausting the available material.

Differences in state-level program review processes are explained in terms of six design decisions and the implementation environment. The six areas included: purposes and objectives, scope of the review, schedule of reviews, criteria used, who will be involved in program review, and decisions to be made. (MLW)

Discusses the conflict between the control or coordinating agencies of state government and the individual colleges and universities that are subject to their ministrations. (Author)

The former director of the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia advocates leadership by a coordinating board squarely in the middle between legislature and institutions. (Editor)

A 22-item bibliography on statewide planning is presented. (PG)

Most states must assume more leadership in the supervision of institutions and the licensing of professional practitioners if the public and the good name of higher education are to be protected. (Editor)

Mistakes were made during the 1960s as planning became a continuing responsibility of colleges and universities, but the lessons learned then can help higher education prepare for the 1980s. (Editor)

Recommendations by the recent task force of the Education Commission of the States on statewide coordination include six items of advice for the organization and conduct of coordinated planning. (Editor)

The role of statewide governing and coordinating boards to represent a statewide, public interest point of view within that structure, avoiding partisan politics and partisanship among educational institutions or interest groups is discussed. Three functions of the statewide postsecondary agencies are identified: planning, program and budget…

An action-inquiry strategy that colleges, universities, and state agencies can use to design and test new approaches to tuition and student aid is proposed. Several institutional aid policy case studies are examined from two perspectives: as a process of rethinking the theories underlying current policy, and from the viewpoint of communication…

Changing demographics, public expectations, and economic circumstances mean that traditional measures of postsecondary educational quality may need to be supplemented. The California Commission for the Review of the Master Plan for Higher Education is looking at options for responding to the demand for better programs and teachers. (MLW)