Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Coding | 3 |
Statistical Analysis | 3 |
Intervention | 2 |
Persuasive Discourse | 2 |
Undergraduate Students | 2 |
Cheating | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Computer Mediated… | 1 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Deception | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Schraw, Gregory | 3 |
Bendixen, Lisa D. | 1 |
Hartley, Kendall | 1 |
Kehrwald, Nicholas | 1 |
Nussbaum, E. Michael | 1 |
Olafson, Lori | 1 |
Quinn, Linda F. | 1 |
Spatariu, Alexandru | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Need for Cognition Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Olafson, Lori; Schraw, Gregory; Kehrwald, Nicholas – Journal of College Student Development, 2014
Academic dishonesty, also known as academic misconduct, includes a variety of actions such as plagiarism, cheating on tests using text messaging or concealed notes, exchanging work with other students, buying essays from students or on the Internet, and having other students write examinations (Diekhoff, LaBeff, Shinohara, & Yasukawa, 1999;…
Descriptors: Student Behavior, Cheating, Deception, Plagiarism
Nussbaum, E. Michael; Schraw, Gregory – Journal of Experimental Education, 2007
It is important, when writing opinion essays, for students to consider and integrate both arguments and counterarguments to develop a final conclusion. In this article, the authors explored the effect of criteria instruction and a graphic organizer to promote integration of arguments and counterarguments. The researchers randomly assigned 84…
Descriptors: Instructional Materials, Evaluation Criteria, Scoring Rubrics, Holistic Evaluation
Spatariu, Alexandru; Hartley, Kendall; Schraw, Gregory; Bendixen, Lisa D.; Quinn, Linda F. – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2007
Many consider rich argumentation to be the core of quality discussions and view it as a vehicle to solving problems and clarifying content. This study examined the influence of a discussion leader intervention on the quality of online argumentation and interactivity. Subjects were 44 undergraduate students who participated in online discussions on…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Persuasive Discourse, Higher Education, Computer Mediated Communication