NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Buxó-Lugo, Andrés; Toscano, Joseph C.; Watson, Duane G. – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2018
It is generally assumed that prosodic cues that provide linguistic information, like discourse status, are driven primarily by the information structure of the conversation. This article investigates whether speakers have the capacity to adjust subtle acoustic-phonetic properties of the prosodic signal when they find themselves in contexts in…
Descriptors: Intonation, Suprasegmentals, Cues, Discourse Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Price, Jessica M.; Sanford, Anthony J. – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2018
Previous research has shown that information referring to a named character or to information in the main clause of a sentence is more accessible and facilitates the processing of anaphoric references. We investigated whether the use of such cues are maintained in healthy aging. We present two experiments investigating whether information…
Descriptors: Aging (Individuals), Language Processing, Discourse Analysis, Phrase Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kehler, Andrew; Rohde, Hannah – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2017
According to Question-Under-Discussion (QUD) models of discourse interpretation, clauses cohere with the preceding context by virtue of providing answers to (usually implicit) questions that are situated within a speaker's goal-driven strategy of inquiry. In this article we present four experiments that examine the predictions of a QUD model of…
Descriptors: Prediction, Questioning Techniques, Models, Expectation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mayerhofer, Bastian; Maier, Katja; Schacht, Annekathrin – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
In garden path (GP) jokes, a first dominant interpretation is detected as incoherent and subsequently substituted by a hidden joke interpretation. Two important factors for the processing of GP jokes are salience of the initial interpretation and accessibility of the hidden interpretation. Both factors are assumed to be affected by contextual…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Cues, Humor, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Burkett, Candice; Goldman, Susan R. – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
Comparisons of literary experts and novices indicate that experts engage in interpretive processes to "get the point" during their reading of literary texts but novices do not. In two studies the reading and interpretive processes of literary novices (undergraduates with no formal training in literature study) were elicited through…
Descriptors: Literature, Novices, Undergraduate Students, Protocol Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Autry, Kevin S.; Levine, William H. – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2014
Negated words take longer to recognize than non-negated words following sentences with negation, suggesting that negated concepts are less active. The present experiments tested the possibility that this reduced activation would not persist beyond immediate testing. Experiment 1 used a probe task and materials similar to those used in previous…
Descriptors: Sentence Structure, Morphemes, Language Processing, Reading Comprehension