NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hummel, Thomas J.; Johnston, Charles B. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979
Stochastic approximation is suggested as a useful technique in areas where individuals have a goal firmly in mind, but lack sufficient knowledge to design an efficient, more traditional experiment. One potential area of application for stochastic approximation is that of formative evaluation. (CTM)
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Research Design, Statistical Analysis, Technical Reports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bell, John F. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1985
This paper outlines the problems associated with the estimation of variance components in generalizability analyses using analysis of variance software, and discusses the most useful software currently available for this specialist application: the MIVQUE method of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) procedure VARCOMP. (Author)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Computer Software, Generalizability Theory, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Olejnik, Stephen F.; Porter, Andrew C. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1981
The evaluation of competing analysis strategies based on estimator bias and variance is demonstrated using gains in standard scores and analysis of covariance procedures for quasi-experiments conforming to the fan-spread hypothesis. The findings do not lead to a uniform recommendation of either approach. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Bias, Data Analysis, Evaluation, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Maxwell, Scott E. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1980
Five methods of performing pairwise multiple comparisons in repeated measures designs were investigated. Consideration of both Type I and Type II error rates found in the simulated conditions for the five procedures suggests that a Bonferroni method utilizing a separate error term for each comparison should be employed. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Woodworth, George G. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979
Computation and interpretation of Bayesian full-rank multivariate analysis of variance and covariance is described and illustrated in an exposition intended for readers familiar with univariate analysis of variance and multiple regression. (Author)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Bayesian Statistics, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rozeboom, William W. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1981
Browne's definitive but complex formulas for the cross-validational accuracy of an OSL-estimated regression equation in the random-effects sampling model are here reworked to achieve greater perspicuity and extended to include the fixed-effects sampling model. (Author)
Descriptors: Least Squares Statistics, Mathematical Models, Multiple Regression Analysis, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burstein, Leigh; And Others – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1978
The concerns of this investigation are multiple sources of complications in the analysis of multilevel educational data. Selected multilevel methods provide some indication of misspecification and can identify the direction of the bias in estimating teacher/class effects on mean class outcomes. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Educational Research, Regression (Statistics), Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ross, Kenneth N. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979
It is shown that using formulae for the estimation of sampling errors based on simple random sampling, when a design actually involves cluster sampling, can lead to serious underestimation of error. Jackknife and balanced repeated replication are recommended as techniques for dealing with this problem. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johnson, Eugene G. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1989
The effects of certain characteristics (e.g., sample design) of National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data on statistical analysis techniques are considered. Ignoring special features of NAEP data and proceeding with a standard analysis can produce inferences that underestimate the true variability and overestimate the true degrees of…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Estimation (Mathematics)