Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 17 |
Descriptor
Source
Psychological Methods | 19 |
Author
Eid, Michael | 2 |
Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. | 2 |
Aguinis, Herman | 1 |
Amazeen, Polemnia G. | 1 |
Asparouhov, Tihomir | 1 |
Bauer, Daniel J. | 1 |
Bauldry, Shawn | 1 |
Bentler, Peter M. | 1 |
Bockenholt, Ulf | 1 |
Bollen, Kenneth A. | 1 |
Buhner, Markus | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 19 |
Reports - Descriptive | 8 |
Reports - Evaluative | 7 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Li, Libo; Bentler, Peter M. – Psychological Methods, 2011
MacCallum, Browne, and Cai (2006) proposed a new framework for evaluation and power analysis of small differences between nested structural equation models (SEMs). In their framework, the null and alternative hypotheses for testing a small difference in fit and its related power analyses were defined by some chosen root-mean-square error of…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Bollen, Kenneth A.; Bauldry, Shawn – Psychological Methods, 2011
In the last 2 decades attention to causal (and formative) indicators has grown. Accompanying this growth has been the belief that one can classify indicators into 2 categories: effect (reflective) indicators and causal (formative) indicators. We argue that the dichotomous view is too simple. Instead, there are effect indicators and 3 types of…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Computation, Structural Equation Models, Expertise
Muthen, Bengt; Asparouhov, Tihomir – Psychological Methods, 2012
This rejoinder discusses the general comments on how to use Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) wisely and how to get more people better trained in using Bayesian methods. Responses to specific comments cover how to handle sign switching, nonconvergence and nonidentification, and prior choices in latent variable models. Two new…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Factor Analysis, Statistical Analysis
Heene, Moritz; Hilbert, Sven; Draxler, Clemens; Ziegler, Matthias; Buhner, Markus – Psychological Methods, 2011
Fit indices are widely used in order to test the model fit for structural equation models. In a highly influential study, Hu and Bentler (1999) showed that certain cutoff values for these indices could be derived, which, over time, has led to the reification of these suggested thresholds as "golden rules" for establishing the fit or other aspects…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis
Rindskopf, David – Psychological Methods, 2012
Muthen and Asparouhov (2012) made a strong case for the advantages of Bayesian methodology in factor analysis and structural equation models. I show additional extensions and adaptations of their methods and show how non-Bayesians can take advantage of many (though not all) of these advantages by using interval restrictions on parameters. By…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Factor Analysis, Computation
Culpepper, Steven Andrew; Aguinis, Herman – Psychological Methods, 2011
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is used widely in psychological research implementing nonexperimental designs. However, when covariates are fallible (i.e., measured with error), which is the norm, researchers must choose from among 3 inadequate courses of action: (a) know that the assumption that covariates are perfectly reliable is violated but…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Error of Measurement, Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models
Macho, Siegfried; Ledermann, Thomas – Psychological Methods, 2011
The phantom model approach for estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects within structural equation models (SEMs) is presented. The rationale underlying this novel method consists in representing the specific effect to be assessed as a total effect within a separate latent variable model, the phantom model that is added to the main…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis, Sampling
Lai, Keke; Kelley, Ken – Psychological Methods, 2011
In addition to evaluating a structural equation model (SEM) as a whole, often the model parameters are of interest and confidence intervals for those parameters are formed. Given a model with a good overall fit, it is entirely possible for the targeted effects of interest to have very wide confidence intervals, thus giving little information about…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Structural Equation Models, Computation, Sample Size
Preacher, Kristopher J.; Zyphur, Michael J.; Zhang, Zhen – Psychological Methods, 2010
Several methods for testing mediation hypotheses with 2-level nested data have been proposed by researchers using a multilevel modeling (MLM) paradigm. However, these MLM approaches do not accommodate mediation pathways with Level-2 outcomes and may produce conflated estimates of between- and within-level components of indirect effects. Moreover,…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Hypothesis Testing, Statistical Analysis, Predictor Variables
McGrath, Robert E.; Walters, Glenn D. – Psychological Methods, 2012
Statistical analyses investigating latent structure can be divided into those that estimate structural model parameters and those that detect the structural model type. The most basic distinction among structure types is between categorical (discrete) and dimensional (continuous) models. It is a common, and potentially misleading, practice to…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Computation
Imai, Kosuke; Keele, Luke; Tingley, Dustin – Psychological Methods, 2010
Traditionally in the social sciences, causal mediation analysis has been formulated, understood, and implemented within the framework of linear structural equation models. We argue and demonstrate that this is problematic for 3 reasons: the lack of a general definition of causal mediation effects independent of a particular statistical model, the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Inference, Intervention
Harring, Jeffrey R.; Weiss, Brandi A.; Hsu, Jui-Chen – Psychological Methods, 2012
Two Monte Carlo simulations were performed to compare methods for estimating and testing hypotheses of quadratic effects in latent variable regression models. The methods considered in the current study were (a) a 2-stage moderated regression approach using latent variable scores, (b) an unconstrained product indicator approach, (c) a latent…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Geometric Concepts, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Evaluating Model Fit for Growth Curve Models: Integration of Fit Indices from SEM and MLM Frameworks
Wu, Wei; West, Stephen G.; Taylor, Aaron B. – Psychological Methods, 2009
Evaluating overall model fit for growth curve models involves 3 challenging issues. (a) Three types of longitudinal data with different implications for model fit may be distinguished: balanced on time with complete data, balanced on time with data missing at random, and unbalanced on time. (b) Traditional work on fit from the structural equation…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Longitudinal Studies, Comparative Analysis
Savalei, Victoria; Kolenikov, Stanislav – Psychological Methods, 2008
Recently, R. D. Stoel, F. G. Garre, C. Dolan, and G. van den Wittenboer (2006) reviewed approaches for obtaining reference mixture distributions for difference tests when a parameter is on the boundary. The authors of the present study argue that this methodology is incomplete without a discussion of when the mixtures are needed and show that they…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Evaluation Methods, Statistical Analysis
Eid, Michael; Nussbeck, Fridtjof W.; Geiser, Christian; Cole, David A.; Gollwitzer, Mario; Lischetzke, Tanja – Psychological Methods, 2008
The question as to which structural equation model should be selected when multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) data are analyzed is of interest to many researchers. In the past, attempts to find a well-fitting model have often been data-driven and highly arbitrary. In the present article, the authors argue that the measurement design (type of methods…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Multitrait Multimethod Techniques, Statistical Analysis, Error of Measurement
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2