Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Ability | 3 |
Sample Size | 3 |
Statistical Analysis | 3 |
Test Length | 3 |
Differences | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
Test Bias | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Arsan, Nihan | 1 |
Atalay Kabasakal, Kübra | 1 |
Cohen, Allan S. | 1 |
Geisinger, Kurt F. | 1 |
Gök, Bilge | 1 |
Karadavut, Tugba | 1 |
Kelecioglu, Hülya | 1 |
Kim, Seock-Ho | 1 |
Lee, HyeSun | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Karadavut, Tugba; Cohen, Allan S.; Kim, Seock-Ho – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2020
Mixture Rasch (MixRasch) models conventionally assume normal distributions for latent ability. Previous research has shown that the assumption of normality is often unmet in educational and psychological measurement. When normality is assumed, asymmetry in the actual latent ability distribution has been shown to result in extraction of spurious…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Ability, Statistical Distributions, Sample Size
Lee, HyeSun; Geisinger, Kurt F. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2016
The current study investigated the impact of matching criterion purification on the accuracy of differential item functioning (DIF) detection in large-scale assessments. The three matching approaches for DIF analyses (block-level matching, pooled booklet matching, and equated pooled booklet matching) were employed with the Mantel-Haenszel…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Measurement, Accuracy, Statistical Analysis
Atalay Kabasakal, Kübra; Arsan, Nihan; Gök, Bilge; Kelecioglu, Hülya – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2014
This simulation study compared the performances (Type I error and power) of Mantel-Haenszel (MH), SIBTEST, and item response theory-likelihood ratio (IRT-LR) methods under certain conditions. Manipulated factors were sample size, ability differences between groups, test length, the percentage of differential item functioning (DIF), and underlying…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Item Response Theory, Statistical Analysis, Test Bias