Descriptor
| Compensatory Education | 7 |
| Program Evaluation | 7 |
| Research Design | 7 |
| Statistical Analysis | 7 |
| Data Collection | 4 |
| Federal Programs | 4 |
| National Surveys | 4 |
| Achievement Gains | 3 |
| Elementary Education | 3 |
| Individualized Instruction | 3 |
| Mathematics Instruction | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Evaluation and… | 1 |
Author
| Coulson, John E. | 1 |
| Gordon, Barbara, J. A. | 1 |
| Gordon, Kenneth F. | 1 |
| Helms, David C., Jr. | 1 |
| Horst, Donald P. | 1 |
| Linn, Robert L. | 1 |
| Tallmadge, G. Kasten | 1 |
| Valdes, Alice L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 6 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textCoulson, John E. – 1976
Using examples from evaluations of the Emergency School Aid Act (ESAA) Basic Grants Program, the ESAA Pilot Program, and the sustaining effects of compensatory education programs, school and student attrition are discussed. As in the example cases, appreciable attrition can be expected in most longitudinal studies. The possible effects of this…
Descriptors: Attrition (Research Studies), Compensatory Education, Dropouts, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The internal validity of the RMC models, especially Model A, is examined. Concern centers on limiting evaluation to cognitive outcomes, using constant percentile as the no-treatment expectation, and using norms for one test to establish the expected no-treatment performance level for another test. (MH)
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
PDF pending restorationGordon, Kenneth F.; Gordon, Barbara, J. A. – 1973
During 1967 and 1968, TEMPO, a Research affiliate of The General Electric Company, evaluated federal assistance to local school districts to use for compensatory education authorized by 1965 Elementary Secondary Education Act Title I. The specific research questions were straight-forward: (1) Has statistically significant enhancement of pupil…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Cost Effectiveness, Educational Research
Education Turnkey Systems, Inc., Washington, DC. – 1975
This report was submitted by Education Turnkey Systems, Inc. and its subcontractor, Kirschner Associates, Inc. and key University of Maryland and other consultants in response to the needs of the National Institute of Education as specified in the Request for Proposal "to develop a Design to Study Individualized Instruction, as part of a general…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Collection, Evaluation Criteria, Federal Programs
Valdes, Alice L.; Helms, David C., Jr. – 1975
The research design discussed here focuses on four major questions: (1) what the relative effectiveness of well-implemented "individualized" instruction vs. well-implemented "standardized" instruction for recipients of compensatory education in terms of reading achievement, mathematics achievement and classroom climate is; (2)…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Collection, Elementary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Education Turnkey Systems, Inc., Washington, DC. – 1975
This document includes 14 appendices to a report submitted by Education Turnkey Systems, Inc., and its subcontractor, Kirschner Associates, Inc. and key University of Maryland and other consultants in response to the needs of the National Institute of Education as specified in the Request for Proposal "to develop a Design to Study…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Collection, Elementary Education, Federal Programs
Horst, Donald P.; Tallmadge, G. Kasten – 1976
The orientation of this report is that of identifying educational projects which can be considered clearly exemplary. The largest section consists of a 22-step procedure for validating the effectiveness of educational projects using existing evaluation data. It is not intended as a guide for conducting evaluations but rather for interpreting data…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Control Groups
