Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Network Analysis | 3 |
| Statistical Analysis | 3 |
| Business Schools | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cooperation | 1 |
| Educational Improvement | 1 |
| Educational Quality | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ada, Nesrin | 1 |
| Ghosh, Jaideep | 1 |
| Kazancoglu, Yigit | 1 |
| Kshitij, Avinash | 1 |
| Lamprianou, Iasonas | 1 |
| Sagnak, Muhittin | 1 |
| Tayaksi, Cansu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| India | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ghosh, Jaideep; Kshitij, Avinash – Sociological Methods & Research, 2017
This article introduces a number of methods that can be useful for examining the emergence of large-scale structures in collaboration networks. The study contributes to sociological research by investigating how clusters of research collaborators evolve and sometimes percolate in a collaboration network. Typically, we find that in our networks,…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Network Analysis, Sociology, Evaluation Methods
Sagnak, Muhittin; Ada, Nesrin; Kazancoglu, Yigit; Tayaksi, Cansu – Journal of Education for Business, 2017
There is an increasing competition between universities globally to attract students. At this point, to compete, it is imperative for the universities to improve the quality of education provided for their stakeholders, including students, parents, and employers. For improving the quality of education, first of all, the universities should make…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Business Schools, Higher Education, Universities
Lamprianou, Iasonas – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2018
It is common practice for assessment programs to organize qualifying sessions during which the raters (often known as "markers" or "judges") demonstrate their consistency before operational rating commences. Because of the high-stakes nature of many rating activities, the research community tends to continuously explore new…
Descriptors: Social Networks, Network Analysis, Comparative Analysis, Innovation

Peer reviewed
Direct link
