Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Mathematics Achievement | 2 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 2 |
| Metacognition | 2 |
| Protocol Analysis | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkYoung, Adena E.; Worrell, Frank C. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2018
Two studies were conducted to examine and compare the construct validity of scores on the Junior Metacognition Awareness Inventory (JMAI) and problem-solving interview protocols. Participants consisted of 183 middle and high school students attending a university summer program for academically talented youth. Study 1 results indicated that JMAI…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Metacognition, Mathematics Instruction, Academically Gifted
Peer reviewedDesoete, Annemie – Metacognition and Learning, 2008
Third grade elementary school children solved tests on mathematical reasoning and numerical facility. Metacognitive skillfulness was assessed through think aloud protocols, prospective and retrospective child ratings, teacher questionnaires, calibration measures and EPA2000. In our dataset metacognition has a lot in common with intelligence, but…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Intelligence, Protocol Analysis, Validity
