Descriptor
| Item Sampling | 2 |
| Probability | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Analysis of Variance | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Latent Trait Theory | 1 |
| Mathematical Models | 1 |
| Matrices | 1 |
| Participant Characteristics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Psychological… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| California Psychological… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedvan der Linden, Wim J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
The restrictions on item difficulties that must be met when binomial models are applied to domain-referenced testing are examined. Both a deterministic and a stochastic conception of item responses are discussed with respect to difficulty and Guttman-type items. (Author/BH)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Item Sampling, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Models
PDF pending restorationMisanchuk, Earl R. – 1978
Multiple matrix sampling of three subscales of the California Psychological Inventory was used to investigate the effects of four variables on error estimates of the mean (EEM) and variance (EEV). The four variables were examinee population size (600, 450, 300, 150, 100, and 75); number of subtests, (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7), hence the number of…
Descriptors: Adults, Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Item Sampling
